Wow, they removed my post or so it appears. I might have missed it.
Just like I thought they would.
Thanks guys for showing how you boys work across the board. As I said, some people are worse than dopers. The systems in place that you purpote to uphold really aren't important are they? Did I offend your patriotic pride? Don't be offended. Apart from your economy and bozo President, the USA is pretty good. Your country is in a really bad position. If you lost your job tomorrow, would you find another? I feel sympathy for the average american and what they must endure because of a few morons (elected officials). As for the Nth Korea joke. I have a friend that just returned from living in Shanghai and who visited Nth Korea. Not a bad place at all unless you're vocal. Not as bad as the American press has decreed this past decade.
I looked at the other threads that sprung up over a 12 hour period. TFF has been trying to appear differently than I described. He even asked that Evans be tested. I wonder why? That's right...I said he only hated dopers so he could have something to hate. Asking for a level playing field wasn't in his interest. Well credit is due. At least you attempted to level the playing field. But seriously, asking for Evans an Aussie. Is there a link to me there? Hmmnnn. There is a coincidence I'll say. Time will tell if your request was genuine or for appearances. Like most Americans, he is predictable none the less. I struck a nerve didn't I? I've been saying for a long time on this froum Aussies aren't they type of people who get pushed around. We always stand our ground. It's in our national psyche. I guess someone pointing out that another person is a coward who derives pleasure from abusing others anonymously is considered bad in most westernised nations. Fair enough, the old post had to go. I mean TFF abused one forumist so badly that poster created a new alias, but still the admins stuck up for him. Not that I have a great problem with that, everyone deserves a second chance...Alpe and Bala are decent posters and admins who I've noticed do a lot of the muscle work.
Think I'm wrong TFF? Then stop altering your behaviour every time I point out a fault. No, not all Americans are bad...most are decent people. Most of the things I enjoy have origins in the USA, movies, tv, music. You want to know how America is represented today to the world. It is through the internet. Buy yourself a gaming console and hop online and see how America raises it's youth. They voice their opinions live halfway across the globe. They are a direct reflection of the parents or should I say, lack of parenting. It is quite sad, not that other nations youth aren't bad, but American kids have formed their own stereotype which isn't pretty.
Funny thing is, TFF is the primary reason BPC plagued the CN forums. He never altered his behaviour much. He only varied to avoid the daily bans. You gave the guy fuel. He is part of the reason the Clinic became a joke. He was often dealt with promplty by one smart and factual post. Some thought slagging him would **** him off. It didn't. Seeing yet how your behaviour is negative to the Clinic TFF? Irony is since BPC's departure one thing has remained true...some of the posters bagging dopers are as bad if not worse than he was. Double irony is that TFF acts just like one LA. Standover man. The enforcer. You're predictable dude. Could your brain cells cumulative weight be in picograms?

Nah, not possible, you can type and spell. You were right however about one thing. If AC does go down, it will be for Clenbuterol and possibly plasticizers. But that isn't the point. It's always in the finer details. You are also wrong TFF addressing everyone who disagrees with you as having AC as a hero. I don't think any cyclist riding presently is heroic. They're sportsmen. Albeit most are doped. Most heroes end up dead, because they do something heroic. If Contador is my hero. why is my avatar a picture of Cunego? You use the hero monicker as ammunition to back your point of view. But it isn't reflective at all. Just stereotyping like I did of the USA. Neither was accurate and you and I know it. The man who is an antithesis to AC and all the other GC dopers?
Back to AC. If you want to know why the plasticizer test is not clear, look at Merckx Index's post. That is why the Clinic is good. I'd advise everyone to read it. As I was pointing out in between bagging some people, there are problems with the WADA code. What level or threshold is performance enhancing and what should the test perameters be are questions that remain unclear. I get how some people here think you should be able to throw any new test randomly into the public sphere like a suicide bomber and see how many you can get. That doesn't work. You end up with cases like Valjavec's, where they get off. You're simply following an appeasement process. Appearing to be pro-active. All the more reason for a separate doping enforcing body in cycling beside the UCI.
There are too many unknowns with the plasticizer test, and others as well, that those who desire an understanding will be left questioning the motives. Worse, if your officiating bodies protocols aren't clear, cut and properly measured, you end up having to say that your methods don't necessarily prove doping. You end up with someone who for all means is a doper, but you're stretching the imagination to catch them. It's almost like fitting the facts for the result you want. That is never desirable. You need to be able to say beyond a doubt with scientific backing rider A is doping and for a list of reasons that show a performance enhancement that is crystal clear. If you don't, what are you doing psychologically? You're creating a scapegoat. It's appeasement, nothing more. Worse, the other pro cyclists know and the affect of catching a big name is little. The other pro's feel sympathy, not shame. In trying to reverse Omerta the stigmatisation of being a doper needs to be reversed. This outcome does nothing. As I said, if this plasticizer test is as good as they suggest and CAS would not reject it, everyone and I mean everyone needs to be tested tomorrow. All the GT samples. Everyone who gave blood. Get them all in one big swoop. Catch a lot at once, make a deal with them all and give cycling a face change. But as I said, that wouldn't be in the interests of either side of the fence. It would spoil their system and that is wrong. The clean guy still gets shafted. If what I prescribe doesn't happen all this test will ever amount to is a small weapon used to catch the guys falling between the cracks. The ones who fuel the system on it's progressive path. We don't have clean GT winners, we just have the next doped guy winning. Who here wouldn't like to be able to say that Greg Lemond wasn't the last guy to win a GT clean? I would.
PS: To the admins, I won't reply to TFF for a very long time. I'll just ignore him. I've said my two cents.