mycenos said:
This seems like a jump in logic to me. What if Contador's body adjusts quicker to a whole-blood transfer? What if he started doping with refrigerated blood, and saw no need to switch to the freezer method later? What about the logistics of traveling with a portable freezer, when it's so much easier to explain a cooler?
We are talking about a sport where riders routinely pin on the number 13 upside down to avoid bad luck--logic doesn't always triumph. For that matter, we're also talking specifically about an elite cyclist who can afford the best agent in the business, and yet employs his brother instead. So I think it's well possible that he might stick with an older method of doping if it's always worked for him.
We can't rule that out, and as I said, the older method can explain both the CB positive and the presence of DEHP in his system. Obviously, I'm not privy to what Bert does. But freezing has the enormous advantage of not requiring regular blood withdrawals during the racing season. You withdraw blood once or twice during the offseason, when you can afford to be a little weak for a few weeks.
Using refrigerated blood involves regular withdrawal/re-infusion cycles during the season that increases the chances of getting caught. A few years ago, before the passport was developed, blood doping was almost impossible to detect. All a rider had to worry about was keeping his HT below 50%. But now he has to pay attention to other parameters like reticulocyte levels. Hence the evidence that riders are lowering the amounts withdrawn/transfused to 150 ml., and Floyd's testimony that EPO is used to bring reticulocyte levels up (they are suppressed by blood doping).
A rider who uses frozen cells still has to worry about these things, but he worries less, because he's performing fewer manipulations. He only has to transfuse before a major race he wants to do well in, which will probably be only 3-4 times a season. In contrast, a rider using refrigerated blood has to withdraw and transfuse every few weeks, probably beginning in January, and continuing until he has no more races on his schedule. Scheduling has to be done very carefully so it doesn't interfere with performance, so that it can be done when least likely to attract attention, and so on.
You mentioned carrying a freezer as opposed to a refrigerator. I don't think that comes into play. A rider can store frozen cells in his home or anywhere else that affords privacy. When he goes to a race, he can thaw the cells and store them refrigerated for a few days. In fact, the actual transfusion process is exactly the same. So a rider accustomed to storing refrigerated blood will see no disadvantages at all to freezing. He's transfusing the same way he did before. The only thing that has changed is that he doesn't have to keep withdrawing every few weeks.
That seems to me like a no-brainer. It's so much easier and more convenient, why not do it?