Re: Re:
The only interesting stat was players receiving the ball in wide positions. There is a tendency for English teams and players to go wide rather than attempt passing movements through congested areas.
In any event, I am not sure what this has to do with doping?
simoni said:sniper said:domination said:...
The English league has been blood and thunder since time began, doping or not. This is not something that has recently become "well known". The misinformation on here is astonishing.
Although you'd probably be right that pace & intensity was always characteristic of the PL, it was never seen as the primary characteristic.
Afaict, the PL (and british soccer in general) was known first and foremost for brainless kick 'n rush football where you could still break a guy's leg without seeing a yellow card, keepers only played with their hands, etc.
Only in the last decade or so the view of the PL as tactically and technically *** has disappeared (with the exception of the English national squad ), and now it's genuinely known for its pace and intensity compared to other leagues.
All afaict.
Can't access the full paper but abstract reproduced below.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/201284956_Comparison_of_physical_and_technical_performance_in_European_professional_soccer_match-play_The_FA_Premier_League_and_La_LIGA
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare match performance in professional soccer players across two major European championships: Spanish La Liga and English FA Premier League (FAPL). Data were collected using a computerized match analysis system. A total of 5938 analyses were recorded during the 2006–2007 season. The players were classified into six positional roles: central defenders, full backs, central defensive midfielders, wide midfielders, central attacking midfielders, and forwards. The match performance variables analysed included: (i) physical activity – total distance covered, distances covered at high-intensities both with and without possession of the ball; (ii) technical actions – heading and ground duels, passing, time in possession, and ball touches. Comparison of the total distance covered by FAPL and La Liga players showed no difference across individual playing positions but FAPL players generally covered greater distances in sprinting. In contrast, more of the total distance in sprinting was covered by La Liga players when their team was in possession (values from P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), while an equal total sprint distance, irrespective of possession, was observed in FAPL players. La Liga players won more heading duels (49.32% vs. 48.68%) and performed the same proportion of successful passes (76.17%). FAPL wide midfielders had ~20% more ball touches per possession than their La Liga counterparts (2.24±0.54 vs. 2.03±0.55, P < 0.001). In conclusion, our results show that FAPL and La Liga teams present differences in various physical and technical aspects of match-play, suggesting that cultural differences may exist across professional soccer leagues and playing positions.
The only interesting stat was players receiving the ball in wide positions. There is a tendency for English teams and players to go wide rather than attempt passing movements through congested areas.
In any event, I am not sure what this has to do with doping?