DirtyWorks said:
Meanwhile, your position does not change despite the many facts presented for you to consider.
Are we just supposed to ignore 20 years of scandal and say, "Oh, that Taxus4a is right. I guess the doping problem is solved despite evidence everywhere to the contrary."
That's not a forum, that's an echo chamber.
First, I said I here to give my opinion, not to convince anybody, so I dont expect what you said.
My opinion of course has changed, you changed when you suddenly know things that are difficult to know for most of the fans by differents sources and you start analysing and get conclusions. I thought like you two years ago. I even didnt like SKY ( nor I hated, not I like a lot today), so I understand people that think like you, and I dont win anything by saying all this (the same as you), and it is not easy to go in a forum againts mainstream, and more if some posters are quite agressive and try to discredit you in a bad way sometimes (it is not your case)
But I will do it, with respect for all the opinions, becouse is what I consider fair.
I dont ignore 20 years of scandals, I was one of the people analyzing cycling and saying Armstrong is a doper a long time ago when some people defend him, but I did in other way, and the evidence was clear, not like now.
For me was hard, as I imagine for most all the fans, to know how cycling worked inside, to know that my idol Mayo, or others before were no so good, how they lied, etc... It was frustrating. And nobody want to have that feeling again, and most of you are in this defensive and skeptic mode, for that reason, and that is normal.
I didnt say the doping problem is solved. I have said today is possible to win a GT been totally clean.
You say there is evidence everywhere to the contrary... and I say there is evidence everywhere that things have changed a lot, and I demostrate day by day that evidence is there or the evidence you mean it is not a big evidence.
And when you say evidence, do you refer to SKY?, What is that evidence?, I have read a lot of things about that supposed evidence, and it is far to be evidence. Evidence is more than that, evidence is when there is no other possible explanations of things, and there is.
One of the evidence againts Lance, it was Hamilton statements, and he said in his book, today everything is different and is mostly clean. Well, we believe people it depends he said, right?
I could say a lot of things and evidences that suits with that affirmation of Hamilton, and I will pleased of disscus that things you consider evidence nothing have changed and SKy is not clean.
