What salary do you think he'd get in 2024 on Visma? £750k? If so, that's the first €650k that Bora should be compensated.We'll see if the one million eventually will be paidMy guess is: no.
What salary do you think he'd get in 2024 on Visma? £750k? If so, that's the first €650k that Bora should be compensated.We'll see if the one million eventually will be paidMy guess is: no.
Until recently, yes…I thought specialized was the preferred manufacturer of the pros these days
This would be the easiest and most logical solution.What salary do you think he'd get in 2024 on Visma? £750k? If so, that's the first €650k that Bora should be compensated.
We'll see if the one million eventually will be paidMy guess is: no.
If the deal was done and agreed to this summer. But this late comes with additional damages. Bora can't hire a substitute now.This would be the easiest and most logical solution.
Are they? Their time trial bike wasn't especially fast this year. Except for that one time trial in the Tour of courseUntil recently, yes…
I think after the Cervelo hype of 2004-2008, we currently see another Cervelo hype. I think Cervelo currently are considered being the fastest bikes on earth, and probably all about 20 WT teams would love to ride them.
They however only supply Jumbo atm, afaik…![]()
That was a cyclocross team that was all about Van Aert and almost nothing else. They probably had a stronger case that they were being robbed (in their view) of their livelihoods.For van Aert it's currently around 600k. Was 1,2 million at some point. Now if i understand correctly the case is at the last instance that will award that 600k or 0. In any case i doubt van Aert salary was 600k or 1,2 million at the point of transfer. Add to it the legal fees.
Bottom line forget about getting Cian for 100k. And then selling him for a couple of millions? Where indeed did you get such ideas.
Yes, thats true. They probably will sue for compensation. Bad situation for them. Visma gets the "dream rider" and Bora is now left with one open spot and its probably to late to get a new rider while Uijdebroeks and Visma clearly played against the rules.If the deal was done and agreed to this summer. But this late comes with additional damages. Bora can't hire a substitute now.
That was a cyclocross team that was all about Van Aert and almost nothing else. They probably had a stronger case that they were being robbed (in their view) of their livelihoods.
It's not Denk who gets to decide whether Uijtdebroeks is allowed to ride. It's the UCI. They can't block the transfer, but they can block him from actually racing. And of course the UCI, with its heavy French influence, aren't exactly the biggest fans of Visma, so they'll probably be inclined to do so. Question is whether they can provide a legal basis for it.If I'm Denk the way notJumbo is handling this, with the training camp and all, would cause me to insist on a full million dollars buy out or I'd just sit the rider on the sidelines for a year.
Send him to Roubaix, maybe he could even leadout Welsford at Scheldeprijs and the rest of the Belgian carpark calendar.
It's not Denk who gets to decide whether Uijtdebroeks is allowed to ride. It's the UCI. They can't block the transfer, but they can block him from actually racing. And of course the UCI, with its heavy French influence, aren't exactly the biggest fans of Visma, so they'll probably be inclined to do so. Question is whether they can provide a legal basis for it.
Either Uijtdebroeks's termination of his contract with Bora was lawful or it wasn't. If the latter, then it is up to Denk to decide.It's not Denk who gets to decide whether Uijtdebroeks is allowed to ride. It's the UCI. They can't block the transfer, but they can block him from actually racing. And of course the UCI, with its heavy French influence, aren't exactly the biggest fans of Visma, so they'll probably be inclined to do so. Question is whether they can provide a legal basis for it.
No, you can't keep a rider prisoner. You can sue for damages. And, like I said, the UCI can prevent him from racing. Which in effect would be the same as Denk sidelining him, but not quite.Either Uijtdebroeks's termination of his contract with Bora was lawful or it wasn't. If the latter, then it is up to Denk to decide.
Their main goal, winning the Tour? Like they weren't going to try that with Uijtdebroeks still on the team?
Under which rule?No, you can't keep a rider prisoner. You can sue for damages. And, like I said, the UCI can prevent him from racing. Which in effect would be the same as Denk sidelining him, but not quite.
Wow, surprised to see Froom and Fulsgang training in their normal team kits for once and not in all black.
Under which rule?
They'll figure something outUnder which rule?
Bora actually brought Roglič not only to win races but to be a mentor to Cian. Considering Roglič has a much better track record in that compared to lets say Vlasov. Pun intended. Cian rather chose Jonas. Well, so be it. Now i guess other cyclists at Bora will get more opportunities and Roglič will likely need to prolong his career.
They'll figure something out![]()