Clinic Bibliography

[TailWindHome]

126 - "6" the value of w/kg which determine doping - see also 'pseudoscience' the estimation or ignoring of key variables which when combined with times taken from indetermined starting and finish points and rider weights from wikipedia result in a number over 6.

 

[ChewbaccaD]

126 - "6" the value of w/kg which determine doping - see also 'pseudoscience' the estimation or ignoring of key variables which when combined with times taken from indetermined starting and finish points and rider weights from wikipedia result in a number over 6.

127. Butthurt--^^^

 

[ChewbaccaD]

128. "Do you guys smell that?--That funky smell every time BPC comes back to the forum with another sockpuppet...appropriate now. Do you guys smell that?

 

[the sceptic]

127. Butthurt--^^^

128: fantasy world - where sky fans live. see also: BotRadar

 

[TailWindHome]

129 "Whiteboytrash" and "TheTruth" - the pseudonyms adopted by Clinic regulars when vacationing in Fantasy World

 

[Dazed and Confused]

129: Looking a rider in the eyes - pro cycling's torture instrument

 

[TailWindHome]

128. "Do you guys smell that?--That funky smell every time BPC comes back to the forum with another sockpuppet...appropriate now. Do you guys smell that?

130 "Ball, not man" - A contraction of "play the ball, not the man"

 

[red_flanders]

119 "Evidence" - see 117 unless it isn't in which case refer to 118

You just confirmed #71.

71: Evidence - Invariably conflated with "proof" by defenders of obvious dopers. As in "There is no evidence that Armstrong/Wiggins/Froome is doping."

 

[red_flanders]

131: "Circular Backslap" - Admonition delivered to posters who agree with one another or praise another post, delivered by a poster whose argument was just pwned.

 

[red_flanders]

126 - "6" the value of w/kg which determine doping - see also 'pseudoscience' the estimation or ignoring of key variables which when combined with times taken from indetermined starting and finish points and rider weights from wikipedia result in a number over 6.

Only applied to riders upon whom a poster doesn't have a man crush. See also David Walsh.

 

[TailWindHome]

You just confirmed #71.

71: Evidence - Invariably conflated with "proof" by defenders of obvious dopers. As in "There is no evidence that Armstrong/Wiggins/Froome is doping."

132 - "Confirmation Bias" - selecting only the data which we feel confirms our own position and ignoring all other information or misinterpreting data in order that it fits our position

 

[TailWindHome]

133 - "I told you so" - the positive reinforcement of accusations of doping based on poor evidence. See also "We're were right about him" and "They're all dopers"

 

[red_flanders]

132 - "Confirmation Bias" - selecting only the data which we feel confirms our own position and ignoring all other information or misinterpreting data in order that it fits our position

133: Nonsense - not understanding a simple concept and conflating it with an unrelated phenomenon.

 

[blackcat]

134. fat

as it sounds. see: Betsy Andreu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AqcfzfCVUg

 

[D-Queued]

It means the exact same thing outside the forum.

Any such reference outside the Forum is specific to Lance?

Who knew?

...

125 -"Evolution" - the change in biological traits of populations over generations often confused with "progress" - the development of an individual or society in a direction superior to the previous level.

The fanboy pseudo-science rational popular in the clinic to explain radical performance improvement in cyclists who are barely a few years younger than other cyclists, who have absolutely no genetic links in common to explain the phenomenon.

Where it took Mendel's peas multiple generations of genetic selection to express different characteristics now requires only a few months for massive performance improvement between completely unrelated individuals.

Sometimes confused with the 'evolution of doping in cycling'.

Dave.

 

[D-Queued]

135. Cycling is unfairly singled out as having a high incidence of doping. If the shoe fits.

Common fanboy rant and excuse/PR ploy post a positive test.

Dave.

 

[ChewbaccaD]

130 "Ball, not man" - A contraction of "play the ball, not the man"

136. Nobody cares about you playing with your balls- Use Gold Bond. It also might help with #127

 

[ChewbaccaD]

137. Weak TrollKraft- See TailWindHome

 

[ChewbaccaD]

138. Typing "Cadel Evans is a wheel sucking *****" into Google - How I found Cyclingforums, which led me to finding all the other cycling forums I've posted on.

 

[TailWindHome]

139 - "Even if we had it on video you'd say..." - the default response to any realistic evaluation of the quality of evidence against a rider, sometimes deployed in conjunction with a modern usage of the refrain "Never tested positive" and ignoring the possible range of evidence from winking at the camera to full blown confession. And also, you don't so.....

 

[ChewbaccaD]

140. Dailypeloton forums - Like BikeRadar, with worse moderating.

 

[The Hitch]

128: fantasy world - where sky fans live. see also: BotRadar

Bike radar. An internet forum totally unrelated to this one that sceptic is for some reason unnaturally obsessed with but too scared to actually post on himself so just cries about it here all the time.

Seriously dude. If you don't like it that much don't read it or go post their full.time.or something. I come to cn forum to read what's on Cn forum. It's the biggest cycling forum around one every internet cycling fan is familiar with and anyone who wants to post on here can do it themselves. Or create a thread about your crush website rather than hijacking every thread around here by acting as a ***** messenger boy and making off topic updates about what people not registered on here on a totally unrelated forum are saying.

 

[thehog]

141: good post Hog - F&^&&&&#$ awesome post by the Hog.

 

[Netserk]

141: good post Hog - F&^&&&&#$ awesome post by the Hog.

Good post Hog

 

[TheSpud]

141: good post Hog - F&^&&&&#$ awesome post by the Hog.

141: good post Hog (alternate) - when a naff post is ignored to the dismay of the OP