- Aug 6, 2009
- 2,111
- 7
- 11,495
Thoughtforfood said:The fact is that unless they have the left-overs from the meal, the food contamination theory is just a theory. He is going down, and quite honestly, if he doesn't it will be a travesty as the excuses everyone else uses are not accepted either.
A doping positive is a positive. Period. Everyone said DHEA was not really a performance enhancer either, and yet we saw 2 or 3 people go down last year for that.
It may not seem logical that he used something like that, nor that it was on the day before a big stage, but elite professional cyclists are experts in doping regimen, and sad to say, but I believe what we have here is the usage of a product that he thought he could get away with.
Not so fast, there-
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-contador-positive-requires-further-scientific-investigation
“The concentration found by the laboratory was estimated at 50 picograms (or 0,000 000 000 05 grams per ml) which is 400 time less than what the antidoping laboratories accredited by WADA must be able to detect.”
“In view of this very small concentration and in consultation with WADA, the UCI immediately had the proper results management proceedings conducted including the analysis of B sample that confirmed the first result. The rider, who had already put an end to his cycling season before the result was known, was nevertheless formally and provisionally suspended as is prescribed by the World Anti-Doping Code.
“This case required further scientific investigation before any conclusion could be drawn,” it added. “The UCI continues working with the scientific support of WADA to analyse all the elements that are relevant to the case. This further investigation may take some more time.
This may be the biggest non-story in cycling. I hate to break it to those who would have loved to see Contador go down, given what I quoted above I don't see it happening.
