131313 said:Well, he could have done what Zirbel did and just said "I have no idea how it got there". You see how that worked out for him.
Personally, I think it's silly to put all of the eggs in the meat angle, when the reality it that it could be from almost anything. If you were to take a random sample of 100 people and test them for those levels of Clenbuterol, I imagine you'd end up with some pretty surprising results.
I also find it pretty funny that some Spanish scientists are so quick to dismiss the possibility, and conveniently omit the fact the Clenbuterol is still widely used, and legal, in agriculture. It seems they'd rather just toss Bertie under the bus (since he's probably a doped up cyclists) than go through the effort to explain that there are actually acceptable levels of Clenbuterol (and a lot of other scary-sounding substances) laced through the food chain.
The sample might not be random, but with all the tests done in cycling there are ony 2 positives for Clenbuterol despite the propensity to use it for performance enhancement. Maybe this low ratio is due to the levels being under the ability of most labs to find, but it wouldn't appear that there is widespread contamination as you suggest.