very entertaining thread! Can't say I'm surprised, but certainly can't say I predicted it, either.
regarding all the talk about whether clenbuterol would help him or whether he'd be stupid enough to take it or whatever, I can't help but think of Ben Johnson in 1988.
Johnson tested positive for Stanozolol. At the time I remember thinking that it was not the drug most of the guys were taking by then - too much of a blunt instrument compared to what was available. And it seemed clear Johnson was on a sophisticated program. When it all finally came out, they admitted to everything, seven years of the program except they swore he never took stanozolol. They claimed someone framed him or managed to introduce it into his body.
I don't buy that. But it makes me think about this AC situation. Whatever we think about the clenbuterol, it is foolishness to defend him by saying he couldn't have done it because it wasn't a smart move. For reasons we may not know, he certainly may have thought it would help and thought he had it planned/masked so he could get away with it.
We do know it is possible to ingest small amounts of clenbuterol for totally innocent reasons, just as we know it was possible in the 1990s for trace amounts of non-naturally occurring nandrolone to unknowingly be in supplements when guys were testing positive for that in track & field. But I'm afraid that my "benefit of the doubt" meter has been pegged on zero for quite a while when it comes to professional sports. After this positive test, unless someone admits to sabotaging him, we'll be better off if he DOESN'T get off than if he does.