From pubmed.Are you talking about Bhakdi, because on Google Scholar, this is what I get:
![]()
second tier journals like J. Infect Dis, Blood, and J Biol Chem, but that is to be expected of most scientists.
Not enough emphasis on this IMO. Of course we need to do what we can to restrict spread of this virus until hopefully a vaccine becomes available but too many blindly support lockdowns and ignore or are oblivious to the very real carnage this can cause people whose livelihoods are not provided by insulated government jobs, welfare or are retired.![]()
Suicide spike in Japan shows mental health toll of COVID-19
The numbers hint at what may be going on around the world as countries grapple with the fallout from mass unemployment and social isolation.www.japantimes.co.jp
Edit to add:
Also - this article (original source - NYT): https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/10/10/world/coronavirus-europe-resistance-restrictions/
So, which sector do you, personally, happen to fall into?N
Not enough emphasis on this IMO. Of course we need to do what we can to restrict spread of this virus until hopefully a vaccine becomes available but too many blindly support lockdowns and ignore or are oblivious to the very real carnage this can cause people whose livelihoods are not provided by insulated government jobs, welfare or are retired.
Nor sure what you mean by “sectors” but I think there needs to be a balance found.So, which sector do you, personally, happen to fall into?
N
Not enough emphasis on this IMO. Of course we need to do what we can to restrict spread of this virus until hopefully a vaccine becomes available but too many blindly support lockdowns and ignore or are oblivious to the very real carnage this can cause people whose livelihoods are not provided by insulated government jobs, welfare or are retired.
The interesting thing is the lockdown in japan has been less severe and for shorter durations then many countries.
Europe is heading to carnage IMO. Especially I would mention former Czechoslovakia which handled first wave really well. Czechia is already worst in Europe case per 100 000 and Slovakia seems 2-3 weeks behind them. Czechia last day 8618 cases which is quite a lot for 10,7 million country and Slovakia 1887, but more concerning is that more than 17% tests are positive which is also big jump. Governments try to avoid lock downs and economic damages but I thinks it is unavoidable. Number of hospitalisations is 6x bigger over month in Czechia and trippled in Slovakia. I would mention Orava region in Slovakia were weddings ceremonies were main spreaders. There is 14 days incidency more than 100 per 10 000. In region with 100 000 citizens there is 1065 cases last 14 days. I am both curious and worried about next weeks in this two countries.
Obviously politics is playing a massive role to the frustration of the WHO. For some politicians actually catching and surviving Covid has been a wake up call while for others it hasn't changed anything.My cynical interpretation of the last couple of months is that the people in charge simply want to maintain their electability and thus want to be seen imposing additional restrictions only when absolutely forced to (and given the seemingly continuing lack of understanding of exponential growth it may even be too late in some places). And of course when the time will come for those restrictions, it will be your average person who will be blamed since he couldn't COVID-proof his life by himself.
A new twist: Trump stated during Fox interview that the WH medical staff claims "he is cured of C19 and can't infect anyone. " (Paraphrase). He emphasized that he is immune and can't get it or give it to anyone.My cynical interpretation of the last couple of months is that the people in charge simply want to maintain their electability and thus want to be seen imposing additional restrictions only when absolutely forced to (and given the seemingly continuing lack of understanding of exponential growth it may even be too late in some places). And of course when the time will come for those restrictions, it will be your average person who will be blamed since he couldn't COVID-proof his life by himself.
You just summarised exactly what is happening in the Australian state of Victoria. Australia did a great job bringing the initial virus surge to heal back in April via lockdowns. But then the state of Victoria screwed up through badly managed quarantine and contact tracing.My cynical interpretation of the last couple of months is that the people in charge simply want to maintain their electability and thus want to be seen imposing additional restrictions only when absolutely forced to (and given the seemingly continuing lack of understanding of exponential growth it may even be too late in some places). And of course when the time will come for those restrictions, it will be your average person who will be blamed since he couldn't COVID-proof his life by himself.
There really is no alternative to lockdowns..
You say his opinion is not accurate but there are other scientists who share his viewpoints (more in Europe than here right now). Here's a paper by Bhakdi, John Loannidis & Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg presented in Researchgate:He can have his opinions, but just know that his opinions are not accurate. There is no rule that it takes 5 years to make a safe vaccine. IMO, he is using his position to make inaccurate claims as an 'authority' knowing that most people will take his word as gospel. Again, explain how a specific vaccine can't possibly be effective at immunity, but a distantly related virus can be. That is his stated position and it is totally unsupported by logic and evidence at this stage. But, we will see soon enough about the effectiveness of the vaccine.
As for Hahn and the FDA, the companies making the vaccine are going to be around longer than any one individual. They are not likely to put out something that they think is unsafe and potentially upend their gravy train. I have posted about sketchy regulatory decisions there, but it looks like I was wrong to think that a vaccine would be pushed out too quickly. You complaining about vaccine side effects is rich considering that you have no problem with 60-80% of people in the world getting COVID-19. Just bad faith posturing pure and simple IMO.
Times are a changing. JBC has an impact factor of 4.2 now. Both it and J Immunol have seen their stature drop quite a bit over the last 10-15 years. Society based journals are struggling amid newer competition and decreased membership. Personally, I would put first tier journals above 10.0. From an Immunology standpoint, that would include things like J Exp Med (11.7), Nature (42.7), Nature Imm (20.5), Science (41.8), Immunity (21.5), and Cell (38.6). And even within that group you can see a 1 and HC classification there too. The selective top tier limit the number of articles they publish to maintain their high metrics, so second tier is where most people publish (including the majority of my work FWIW) and are respected journals. They are just a lot less well read by your peers. Like with automobiles, some people feel the need to drive BMWs, while others are comfortable in a Subaru, even if they can afford the latter. I rarely read anything below 2.0, which is where I would put 3rd tier. Those publications are resume filler or for people looking for any port in a storm more than anything and are often rife with shoddy peer review.Maybe I've been retired too long, but back in the day, JBC was not second tier, it was one of the best. To take one example, much of Nobel winner Arthur Kornberg's work on DNA synthesis was published there. Somewhat more recently, his son Roger, who also won a NP, published there.
Strictly speaking, that isn't a paper by them. It is a paper about them. The first two conclusions they draw are not only clearly wrong, but Plandemic level propaganda. Did COVID-19 write this article in pseudonym?You say his opinion is not accurate but there are other scientists who share his viewpoints (more in Europe than here right now). Here's a paper by Bhakdi, John Loannidis & Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg presented in Researchgate:"A Tribute To The Coronavirus Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) WHISTLEBLOWERS:"
If Trumps wants to ram through the FDA a Covid vaccine there's not much stopping him, IMO. Remember he apparently didn't care much anymore for Fauci benching him and bringing on board Atlas who's doing most of press releases now. The "Operation Warp Speed" program is his grand idea of getting a vaccine out to the public as fast as possible. In fact, he has said he would even have the military distribute the vaccine.
And yes I'm concerned about the some of the side-effects discovered so far during the clinicals and so is the NIH:
It is amusing that the cover suggests that vaccines are big moneymakers for Pharma. That is far from the truth. Vaccine and antibiotics are not revenue producers and that is a dilemma for society.The new Corona virus is just the harmless, common cold.
The mortality rate is 0.01%, ten times less than influenza.