This morning Boise news showed that case numbers, hospitalizations, and deaths are all down except for in North Idaho. Then the national new was talking about all of those numbers being up in Colorado and Michigan.
yeah, I didn't mean to say "the worst is still to come" - the circumstances are obviously completely different now compared to last year, and allowing to be way more lenient - but I still think the situation differs, from state to state.
There's been a (pre-print) study out last week about it by the way (I just stumbled across today), which calculated the potential burden left for European countries, based on the vaccination- and past infection rate per age group:
![]()
Source: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.10.21266166v1.full.pdf
It's probably not 100% accurate of course because of estimations used for potential breakthrough infections, dark figures and so on, but it shows quite well that a country like Germany is still at significant more risk than England
If you're "personally against mandating vaccination" then what are you doing about it? Are you pushing back against it? Reaching out to state & federal officials? Your Congressman & Senator? I have several relatives, friends & acquaintances who are all fully vaccinated and express the same disapproval of the vaccine mandates. I ask them the same question and many are indifferent not wanting to answer. A few have told me they don't feel comfortable getting involved but yet say they're angered by the mandates. And there must be millions of vaccinated Americans on both sides of the political spectrum who are against the mandates. But again - what are they doing about it?I took just a moment to read the facts of the article: Mandates for working environments are not the same as forced vaccinations, are they? The main play of the piece is to suggest MSM, as it's been labelled; doesn't report the issue or doesn't represent the medical consequences of folks getting C19 after vaccination. Both issues are a play at creating a news issue franchise, IMO.
I am personally against mandating vaccination. I do, however; allow that businesses and governments can judge conditions that prove high-risk and pursue lockdowns and quarantines as needed. The suggestion that's it's some kind of international power play is being accepted by a very skeptical and naive percentage of people. They are also prey to snake oil salespeople hawking vitamins and other treatments that have little to no efficacy. Worse: they know they're pandering to fears but they like to profit.
Except those charts combine unexposed and unvaccinated. So what proportion of the 80+ age group in Germany remain unvaccinated? I suggest a very low proportion because that is what happened in my country? Once you are vaccinated you are effectively exposed to the virus.
The UK and parts of Europe got a head start on vaccination due to their problems but today the UK, Germany and Australia have a similar level of fully vaccinated (about 70%). The remaining unexposed and unvaccinated proportion of the population would be very low. And in the high risk 80+ age group negligible. So I disagree that Germany (or Australia) is at greater risk than UK.
So I still think some of the modelling being used to determine when restrictions can be eased are way too conservative.
Except those charts combine unexposed and unvaccinated. So what proportion of the 80+ age group in Germany remain unvaccinated? I suggest a very low proportion because that is what happened in my country? Once you are vaccinated you are effectively exposed to the virus.
The UK and parts of Europe got a head start on vaccination due to their problems but today the UK, Germany and Australia have a similar level of fully vaccinated (about 70%). The remaining unexposed and unvaccinated proportion of the population would be very low. And in the high risk 80+ age group negligible. So I disagree that Germany (or Australia) is at greater risk than UK.
So I still think some of the modelling being used to determine when restrictions can be eased are way too conservative.
Except those charts combine unexposed and unvaccinated. So what proportion of the 80+ age group in Germany remain unvaccinated? I suggest a very low proportion because that is what happened in my country? Once you are vaccinated you are effectively exposed to the virus.
Source for the vaccination data is the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. I tried to check for up to date 80+ vaccination numbers for comparison, but apparently Germany didn't report any this week, meaning they are not listed:
![]()
![]()
Scientists warn of new Covid variant with high number of mutations
The B.1.1.529 variant was first spotted in Botswana and six cases have been found in South Africawww.theguardian.com
As it is in the nature of viruses to mutate often and at random, it is not unusual for small numbers of cases to arise featuring new sets of mutations. Any variants showing evidence of spread are rapidly assessed,” she said
Yeah, nothing has outcompeted delta like that. There could be sampling issues with those numbers, but it is worth paying attention to. It won't be an issue in Europe or the US for at least a few months. Theoretically, this is a mutant that will accelerate talk about switching up the vaccine formulations. Appears more immune evasive than delta.They've gone from a couple of hundred cases to thousands in no time.
And there's this:
![]()
How can be that s**t so contagious for god sake. Would be great if it will be less deadly though. If it will be this transmisable and deadly as Delta we are doomed.
Yeah, nothing has outcompeted delta like that. There could be sampling issues with those numbers, but it is worth paying attention to. It won't be an issue in Europe or the US for at least a few months. Theoretically, this is a mutant that will accelerate talk about switching up the vaccine formulations. Appears more immune evasive than delta.
Eta. UK and Israel already banning travel to the effected countries. I doubt that will prevent spread, but delaying the spread will help.
When a politician starts talking about the virus, just turn the sound down..................it helps..........as the world waits for the next move by mother nature........How can be that s**t so contagious for god sake. Would be great if it will be less deadly though. If it will be this transmisable and deadly as Delta we are doomed.
just in time for new earnings window next year...you have to appreciate a virus that follows economic scheduleI seem to remember the head of BioNTech saying it takes around 6 weeks to change their vaccine, and the Pfizer CEO said they could get a new vaccine 'ready' (including approval) within 100 days. It seems they should start getting busy...
All time panic. We know little about the variation yet thumbs up on the bad news. It could be following similar patterns of more transmissible and less harmful. Pfizer and Moderna both indicated they can alter the vax to keep up with vatiants. But why wait to panic on a forum?
Yeah, countries are stopping travelling again and experts are saying it's really concerning, but of course it's just people on a forum panicking...
However, if it should turn out to not be problematic or even helpful in pushing Delta aside, good for all of us.
Again basic ethics and simple math discarded. @90-100 million Americans are saying:All time panic. We know little about the variation yet thumbs up on the bad news. It could be following similar patterns of more transmissible and less harmful. Pfizer and Moderna both indicated they can alter the vax to keep up with vatiants. But why wait to panic on a forum?
I have heard the same trope frequently about transmission making viruses less deadly, but it is not something that is universally true. Often it might appear that a virus is weakening. For instance, we have seen fatalities falling in places like the UK. But the 'weakening ' is actually populations gaining immunity. Novelty is what make viruses dangerous. Spanish flu would not kill 100m people if it were released in 2021 because everybody has some pre existing immunity to its viral descendants. In 1917-8, it was novel, so it was very deadly. Viruses and their host species usually find a dynamic equilibrium where you don't see much change over time, but that requires time and SC2 is still adapting.Sounds really, really concerning. I wonder, questions for the experts, how does the development of a virus usually go? I mean, there are many viruses in the world and they do not constantly get more aggressive, right...? Didn't I read that a virus that gets more transmissible usually becoming less severe as well?
Now there's even talk again of a possible strict Christmas lockdown... will this never end?
Maybe now, after two years, it's finally time to seriously improve the whole health system, and not just go from one contact/ transmission measure to the next one...