The big loss might be that we don't get top Pogacar against top Vingegaard at the Tour. It would be a spectacular war.
The big loss might be that we don't get top Pogacar against top Vingegaard at the Tour. It would be a spectacular war.
Oh yes. Some riders get fit during the Tour. Of course not starting at 96 or 97 %. But at 98/99 %. As Evenepoel will start at that level and maybe even Vingegaard.You don't get fit during the Tour. If you're not fit at the beginning, you're ***. One of the rather annoying cycling myths.
The race needs a top Vingegaard and a top Pogacar, otherwise the Tour 2024 will not be so entertaining as the Tour 2023 and Tour 2022.The big loss might be that we don't get top Pogacar against top Vingegaard at the Tour. It would be a spectacular war.
Toby is right. The only way you can have this discussion seriously about peaking for the third week is by moving it to the clinicYou don't get fit during the Tour. If you're not fit at the beginning, you're ***. One of the rather annoying cycling myths.
Nah, the drama was in slaying the Pog. Now it's potentially slaying the fisherman. It's just that nobody recognized the latter to be the greater feat. The problem is Pog has uped his game to try and resist a superior Vingo, who crashed so can't be in top shape. So my original point lies herein.The race needs a top Vingegaard and a top Pogacar, otherwise the Tour 2024 will not be so entertaining as the Tour 2023 and Tour 2022.
Frankly, i don't share the faith in Jorgenson becoming the climber/GT/GC rider with some people since PN. What happened in PN needs to be seen in the right context. He was further along in his preparations, because for him the cobbled classics that started less than 2 week later, were a big goal. This was not the case for the other competitors who were at best eyeing the Ardennes. He won the GC because the chasing group was playing games in a crucial stage and let him, McNulty and Skjelmose gain time. The guy lives in Nice and basically was riding on his daily training route. There were no HC climbs in PN, let alone multiple in one stage for two or three stages in a row. And the guy is 1m90, which makes it extremely difficult to become an elite climber, especially when trying to combine that with being a classics rider.But really looking forward to seeing how Jorgenson, Ayuso and Rodriquez go
Is anyone else surprised with the difficulty of both the Dauphiné and the Tour de Suisse?
Dauphiné has 5 summit finishes. Granted, there are 2 of them that are more hill finishes than mountain finishes but, Collet d'Allevard, Samoens and Glieres are all tough, steep climbs 3 days in a row.
Then the Tour de Suisse seems to have 5 summit finishes in a row. A mountain time trial to top it all off. Seems unusual to have so many uphill finishes in just a week long race. Sprinters can stay at home.
I don't see the contradiction here and you are absolutely right. Stronger climbers saving something in the bag for Le Tour against a tad less strong climbers, not selected for the big one, can form the basis for some indeed interesting stages.Yeah, it could be a bit repetitive. But I was thinking the same thing of Tour de Suisse last year, yet it shifted all the time who was the strongest on the specific day.
I mean, at least we know why there won't be any downhill finishes in the TdS this year...Yeah, it could be a bit repetitive. But I was thinking the same thing of Tour de Suisse last year, yet it shifted all the time who was the strongest on the specific day.
I don't think it's smart to organise such hard Dauphinéz and TDS's. Riders who go for it completely (especially in the several mountain stages) risk to run out of fuel during the last Tour week. The Dauphiné was very notorious for that in the past. Several riders who performed well or even won, received quite a severe relapse during the second half of the Tour. I know, times have changed. Riders are better prepared (in terms of nutrition, medical.....). But still. As a teamleader I wouldn't allow Roglic and Evenepoel (but not able to at this moment) to go all out. Certainly not every day. Even if it costs day victories or the final victory.I don't see the contradiction here and you are absolutely right. Stronger climbers saving something in the bag for Le Tour against a tad less strong climbers, not selected for the big one, can form the basis for some indeed interesting stages.
Still up to the riders (and their team DS and coaches) to decide whether use Dauphiné and TdS as warmup or to clamp down gas pedal to the medal.I don't think it's smart to organise such hard Dauphinéz and TDS's. Riders who go for it completely (especially in the several mountain stages) risk to run out of fuel during the last Tour week. The Dauphiné was very notorious for that in the past. Several riders who performed well or even won, received quite a severe relapse during the second half of the Tour. I know, times have changed. Riders are better prepared (in terms of nutrition, medical.....). But still. As a teamleader I wouldn't allow Roglic and Evenepoel (but not able to at this moment) to go all out. Certainly not every day. Even if it costs day victories or the final victory.
Agree, I think those three will be the strongest as well. Dno what order though.Roglic, Rodriguez and Ayuso on podium in that order.
Yes, we will allow it.Can I just say I'm super excited about the Dauphine starting tomorrow?