Okay... Details? More info? It's fine and easy to say that but anyone could about anyone. It is just too vague. It plants suspicion without even a pretense of substantiation. It might as well be 'I heard that some people who went to college with pat mcquaid found half-eaten children under his bed'... Okay well... Great.
I am as keen to hear real details as anyone. Otherwise it is just flaming. Sorry for the unnecessary hyperbole but I think it illustrates my point, however exaggerated
A lot of people on this forum really know their stuff. I will respect any justified/substantiated claims. A lot of other people here seem to throw out random, easy generalizations again and again seemingly just to post and continually let everyone know that they think 'everyone dopes' when everyone already knows they think that. It does not breed intelligent discussion at all. It is empty and pointless rhetoric. A very valid theory but useless unless Substantiated AT LEAST on some small level.
I aPologise for the length of my first post. I certainly do not expect many to bother reading it all. I simply want some real damn evIdence if it exists.