In
this video, mixed martial artist "The Notorious" Connor McGregor, who challenges UFC featherweight champ José Aldo for his belt at UFC 194 (12.12.2015, Las Vegas), and who rarely is at a loss for an outrageous sound bite, opines that the UFC's new drug testing program, though an improvement, still has flaws. Referring to the
Brazilian police interfering with the Nevada state athletic commission's agent's attempts to administer an OOC to Aldo in Brazil in advance of their (injury-postponed) UFC 189 bout (11.07.2015, Las Vegas), the notorious one offers that testing should be administered exclusively by other than the fighter's own countrymen. The USADA stratagem, OTOH, is to use the local WADA agents in whatever country the athlete happens to be in.
I believe I have mentioned elsewhere in this forum that IMHO, when it comes to policing PEDs in its own nation, Brazil is to MMA as Spain is to road cycling. McGregor mentions that AASs are sold over the counter in Brazil, which I am given to understand is true, so McGregor's reservations are not without merit.
However, the alternative seems highly impractical, if only due to the added expense and wasted manpower of perpetually flying 3°-nation WADA testers around the world to do the testing. Because if it is flawed to use a tester from the fighter's own country, then it also is flawed to use a tester from his opponent's country. And every test necessarily involves international travel, not to mention it ass-u-me-s that all third nation individuals will be impartial.
Rough numbers, figuring the number of UFC fighters (~450), the number of their countries (~50), and the number of events (~42) and bouts per year (~900), I figure it would cost several millions of Euro (4M-5M) per year in airfare, ground travel, tester salary, hotel accommodations, and meals (roughly the same amount as what the UFC are believed to be paying to USADA to administer the program) just to test one-half of all athletes in the run-up to the fight, plus one-half again on fight day. Add another 25%-50% for the inclusion of additional random testing. And even that only comes to about 2.5 tests per athlete per year.
I would speculate the Fertittas are far too tight-fisted for this to be even remotely feasible.
And if 3°-nation testers is a bad idea for the UFC, it's an even worse one for cycling. Cyclists come from so many different countries, and the numbers of competitors might be ten-fold greater at a given race than at any UFC event. Not to mention team rosters are prone to change without notice. The only workable option would be to recruit testers only from countries with no professional cycling. So what does that leave? Burkina Faso? Myanmar? St. Helena?
[satire]
I briefly considered the Holy See as an option, as I never have heard tell of a professional cyclist from there, but I'm thinking they might be under-equipped for such a large operation purely due to a lack of manpower. A problem compounded by the fact that almost a third of its citizens are Swiss-born, and since there are many Swiss pro cyclists, that brings their impartiality into question (when was the last time anyone impugn the neutrality of the Swiss?). So scratch the Vatican from the list.
Nepal might be a good source. Think about it, Gurkhas as doping testers. Stern-faced and steely eyed little men in slouch hats, brandishing a big, curved knife at the little men in gaily-coloured spandex, and admonishing them not to dope. Wouldn't even need a hypodermic needle, just *** the rider with that damn knife and catch the blood in a cup as it runs out. It certainly would scare me straight.
[/satire]
Long story short, Connor, I'm afraid it isn't going to happen. Not in the UFC and certainly not in pro cycling.