- Sep 29, 2012
- 12,197
- 0
- 0
Re: Re:
Just so your post does not muddy the waters of what I wrote, let's consider 2 possibilities:
1. Cadel adopts but is capable of making children of his own: quite possibly the most charitable motivation to adopt - to make a better life for another human being
2. Cadel adopts, but we find out later he cannot make his own chidlren. ie the only way he is ever going to have children is through adopting.
If you cannot see how the second option now looks less purely charitable, I cannot help you.
If anyone else is confused and would like further clarification, please let me know.
movingtarget said:Dear Wiggo said:So Chiara and Cadel have split - nothing good about that. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3093678/End-road-cycling-champion-Cadel-wife-Long-distance-career-spells-end-couple-s-ten-year-marriage-vow-stay-friends-adopted-son.html
I did not know that they had tried to have kids for years and failed - I was under the naive impression their adoption was purely charitable.
We know exogenous testosterone affects sperm production This latest revelation seems almost an indictment?
Maybe you can define an uncharitable adoption.
Just so your post does not muddy the waters of what I wrote, let's consider 2 possibilities:
1. Cadel adopts but is capable of making children of his own: quite possibly the most charitable motivation to adopt - to make a better life for another human being
2. Cadel adopts, but we find out later he cannot make his own chidlren. ie the only way he is ever going to have children is through adopting.
If you cannot see how the second option now looks less purely charitable, I cannot help you.
If anyone else is confused and would like further clarification, please let me know.
