The Hegelian said:
But it's also a 'what if'.
Being mutant gains all of its semantic traction by being completely unambiguous. We look and we just know, automatically. i.e. Riis in the big ring, Froome in one of his seated frenzies etc. I don't think we can seriously argue that Evans hanging on on a big col, looking bloody dreadful, exemplified that mutantcy.
second point, second reply.
how about if concerns were baselined, from previous form that we understood as norms. Riis was a solid domestique. Wiggins and Froome were solid pros like all of the peloton, and indeed, I was was of the promoters of Froome, on the back of Siutsou and his first Tdf, their debut with Barloworld and John Robertson's team around 2008. I have no doubt they were doping then, unlike other cases, I do have a backstory there, but they were phenomenally talented riders who demonstrated significant talent.
But Froome and Wiggins dropping about 7-8% bodyweight? this was absolute bullsh!t. We saw them when they weighed 72kg, and 74kg, and Froome was in the front group, but Wiggins was in the gruppetto.
Evans was always just hanging on to the front group in the final 7kms. He could never attack. p'raps indeed that was mutant for his talent. just not extra mutant like Armstrong and Contador and Rasmussen