I’m a little confused as to how Roglic is the big villain here today. Vingegaard has attacked on two mountain stages in a row, and Roglic sat with the group, giving up his chances at red to a teammate behind him on GC. Today he attacked and, unlike Roglic, Vingegaard and Kuss immediately followed. Yesterday, Roglic was supposed to get the win but Vingegaard took it. Today, Roglic took the win for himself. The problematic one, IF you think the team should ride for Kuss, is Vingegaard, who has gone from third to two minutes back to 8 seconds off the lead by leaving behind his teammate in red 3 stages in a row.
Roglič is being portrayed as the villain because there are a lot of sentimentalists (and a lot of Americans, or people like Bruyneel and Benji who are targeting an American audience, being among the most vocal of these) who want to see Kuss win and are upset now that it looks like he would need a gift to keep it. Some of them are just straight up asking for a gift, others are conflicted because they don't want to see formation riding take away the only racing left, but their favoured option for the win is now looking like he needs a gift to do so.
Plus of course those raised on the sport in the Armstrong era have had the importance of the unwritten rules drilled into them as sacrosanct, and so it leaves a bad taste in their mouth. It's certainly happened plenty of times before and it's always controversial, but usually it's just between two riders, not three. Roche and Visentini, Fignon and Hinault, Olano and Jiménez, Contador and Armstrong. I mean, the Schleck brothers held a grudge for how many years against Carlos Sastre, and he even asked Fränk for permission to attack on Bonette, which was denied, was a good boy and heeded his teammate's wishes even though he was nominally the team leader, and only attacked on Alpe d'Huez because it was his last chance left to win the Tour (AND Fränk proved not strong enough to have won anyway so Carlos' decision was vindicated).
I don't really like what I am seeing at the Vuelta, just kind of makes me feel a bit sad, but I do love racing.
"I do love racing, but I want them not to race because the guy I want to win may lose."
Not to dig at you individually, we all have that cognitive dissonance sometimes. But just to point out that that is what you're saying. You love racing, but you want them to not race one another and just shepherd Kuss to the line because he's the guy you want to win and he's now shown to be vulnerable.
He also started out (also after Kuss was in red) that he still hoped he would win himself.
Now when he can sense that it's out of fashion to say that, he suddenly has a different opinion.
I'm sure he'll be crying when he does get red. But the tears will be fake.
100%.
Vingegaard will win this Vuelta (unless there's suddenly an intervention from Plugge & Zeeman who forcibly freeze GC now), but he'll do so because of team orders only, i.e. favoritism from the car on the Tourmalet & Bejes, which a touch of serious luck involved when UAE didn't chase.
...and if they get instructed to ride in formation and Kuss wins, surely that would be due to team orders and favouritism from the team car only just as much?