The Hitch said:
Well I want to wear my bycicle helmet next time i enter a bank. Oh wait, I cant. But it seems some people can cover their face on the grounds that Western Society must not be percieved as being anything other than welcoming to any ideas, however wrong, unfair or even unconstitutional so long as a religion takes up that rule as being part of their faith.
And if something is part of someone's faith it must be respected, held up as a model for prosperity and cohesion.
I think you make an argument that's merely convenient to an ideological position, which doesn't consider the important why's as to the radicalization of the Muslim world. These (also) have much to do with the debatable policies that the West often used when dealing with the Islamic countries, with little concern for anything but its oil.
And while it is true that the Muslim societies, themselves, have an equal share in this phenomenon, the fact that the West effected policies in the region that often supported a totalitarian state that prevented progressive social reforms, the religious cast often filled in what the political leadership could not provide: that is a cultural identity.
But places like Iran, Iraq, Syria and others were often 60-70 years ago headed, before Western policies helped radicalize the situation, toward a more liberal and modernized Muslim world then they have since become.
The West doesn't want to be perceived as tolerant, but if it is to live up to its values needs to be so. The problem is, given all the things we did in many places around the globe, and with our recent misadventures in Iraq and Afghanistan, the West as a global model of Values is not very convincing.
On the respecting of faith, this is embedded in our constitutions. It is thus for the people to decide when respecting one's faith is natural to the ideas of liberty and tolerance within such a constitutional construction, and when the (non-elected) religious authorities simply have too much sway within the system of a modern, lay democracy. They do this by the types of candidates they are willing to vote for into office.
Unfortunately, so long as the people continue to give value to the religious authorities, they, by nature, like to try and organize society according to their beliefs and frequently succeed in doing so by conditioning the politcal debates and social convictions.