Mitigating the risk
Dudettes and Dudes,
I cannot understand why people blame the french for this. Let's say the circumstances where the same: JB needed to call the UCI to confirm the tester was legit. If LA or JB had 1/2 brain to judge the situation and to forecast the pros and cons of LA taking a shower, LA should have been in the tester's sight 100% of the time. That way there is no way for misinterpretation or a way to spin the story even if leaked to the press. I can guarantee that LA has stood messing around his garage for hours in the same bike shorts after a long training ride. so, why did this time taking a shower is so important? He could have had JB going inside and get him his recovery drink, socks, shoes, etc. Is LA's schedule so tight that every second counts? Sadly, he is a pro-cyclist now and there is a way to play the game....
The fact of the matter here is that the poor judgement that LA and his crew showed is getting them into a pickle.
Now, look at the oposite side of the coin. When a sample is tested, there is an strict protocol to follow by the WADA authorized lab about the handling of that sample. One of Landis' defenses was exactly that, the lab did not follow protocol. Should not there be some sort of protocol for the athlete to follow after the tester arrives? i.e. never be out of sight? In fact, when a rider is picked for testing at a race, the rider would be accompanied after going over the finish line to the testing facility. The rider is not out of sight....
My point: regardless of whether or not this is fair or not, LA and his crew showed poor judgement and this is an issue now.