Puckfiend said:
Froome is in Colorado, not Belgium. I think the announcers said he and most of Sky had only arrived on Wednesday, leaving very little time to acclimate to the high areas of the Rockies. I would assume that racing at 8000+ feet above sea level has a lot to do with his and Porte's rather lackluster times. When Evans raced their after his TdF win, he was pack fodder too.
As a matter of fact, the entire peloton looked gassed climbing a 3.5 per cent climb up to the Snowmass ski resort.
It takes a good two weeks to acclimate to altitude with regard to performance in an aerobic sport. Did every other team get there weeks ago and SKY are the only ones to show up? I would tend to doubt it, though I don't know when anyone got there.
If others got there late, did they all perform poorly compared to their performances all year? I mean Froome and Porte have gone from destroying the peloton in every race to losing minutes on a stage Peter Sagan won. That is a dramatic drop in performance and I don't see anything comparable.
So is it that they aren't trying? Possible. Is it that they've withdrawn blood in prep for the Worlds? Possible. Is it both, with the former a result of the latter? Possible. Did they acclimate worse than anyone else? Possible. Did they both just have a really bad day after not having one all year? Possible.
What would the history of the sport tell you? What would Occam's Razor indicate?
At the very least, do it not warrant questions being so outside the performance levels we're seeing from other riders?