Re: Re:
Is there any credible evidence that Froome and Brailsford were in om the discussion as equal partners with the UCI/ASO? Or are you guys hinging everything on the phrasing of that short video?
thehog said:sniper said:excellent first post, jarnix.
agree that Sky is turning the sport into a farce, with a high degree of @sshole-ship at the cost of traditional cycling etiquettes.
Froome, btw, should've been disqualified following UCI rules:
https://twitter.com/MRasmussen1974/status/753936589370327041
Oh well.
the list of favors UCI have done Sky is growing by the day.
The scepticism about yesterday's decision and the smell of favoritism, well UCI and Sky owe it to themselves.
Because the entire stage was a **** show, with many riders breaking the rules, taking illegal feeds etc. it should have been annulled in totality. The outcome hat occurred was giving bonuses to specific riders because bad luck occurred.
Cancelling the time on stage doesn't impact the race as there is still 4 MTFs to come including two TTs.
It was a poor decision for all riders but if Sir Dave has a front seat at the UCI table, then what can you do?
Is there any credible evidence that Froome and Brailsford were in om the discussion as equal partners with the UCI/ASO? Or are you guys hinging everything on the phrasing of that short video?