airstream
BANNED
Cimber said:Does the fact that others did the same make it ok for Froome?
Deal with it. Do you remember as we discuss who is stronger in general 100% Froome or 100% Contador before the Tour? we got the answer.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Cimber said:Does the fact that others did the same make it ok for Froome?
Carstenbf said:Show us the data!!
Cimber said:The Chicken about Froome (google-translated):
- The very short answer when I asked if I trust Chris Froome is: 'No'. The slightly longer answer is that it is simply going too fast. It was too violent, what we saw on Mont Ventoux, writes Michael Ramussen.
'Chicken' even drove from everything and everyone in the mountains during the Tour de France in 2007 with illegal doping drugs in the blood. And it is precisely the experience he draws on when he sees Team Sky rider blow all opposition backwards in this year's edition.
- When one has had its time in the field for many, many years and have been on the wrong side of right and wrong, then you can still get a pretty clear sense of when something is fast, and when something is To fast. What we saw yesterday was TO fast, writes Michael Rasmussen
http://www.bt.dk/cykling/kyllingen-jeg-tror-ikke-paa-chris-froome
airstream said:Deal with it. Do you remember as we discuss who is stronger in general 100% Froome or 100% Contador before the Tour? we got the answer.
No, but it'd close down that flank for Sky. Getting harder and harder to maintain the transparency/cleanliness argument.Justifiably, I severely doubt the Clinic would trust the data even if it was released!
Cimber said:Oh yes we got the answer alright. He is way better than Contador. But is he clean? I very much doubt it.
The Hitch said:Thomas Frei has on Twitter also been doubting froome and sky over the last few months.
Interesting that those coming out of the lance scandal when dopers walked around telling everyone they doped, say they can believe sky, or at least want to - Rr, Walsh, Frankie, tyler.
But these 2 from a more recent era aren't as convinced.
airstream said:Surely he uses doping like any other in top 10 at least. A clean TdF winner is a big bubble
MatParker117 said:Sky actually do have an internal testing program. They also don't sign a rider without looking at his bio-passport and have passed on at least two riders due to dodgy data.
The Hitch said:Funny how many riders they signed in recent years were 5 or above on the uci list.
airstream said:Hitch, explain to me pls such a metamorphosis like...
You are not a foolish guy, an active forum member, a man who pretends to have some objectivity and philosophical arguments. But... Based on absolutely the same reasons you proclaim one guy 'ambassador of our sport" and denigrate other guys in every way. Explain, how these things are combined?
wansteadimp said:Justifiably, I severely doubt the Clinic would trust the data even if it was released!
Fearless Greg Lemond said:riccardo riccò @riccardo_ricco 3u
Finalmente il ciclismo ha trovato un corridore pulito che batte tutti i record di corridori dopati!!!
"Finally cycling found a clean rider who beats all the doped riders' records!!!"MizunoMX20 said:Translation please!!!
MizunoMX20 said:Translation please!!!
google translate is not a friend of anyone.Cimber said:goggle-translate is your friend:
Riccardo Ricco @ riccardo_ricco 3u
Cycling has finally found a clean runner who breaks all records of runners doped!
MizunoMX20 said:Translation please!!!
Eshnar said:google translate is not a friend of anyone.
But in this case it's right
He will go ballistic on the climbs and then descend like the Sir.Bavarianrider said:So will Froom go balistic in the TT or will he hold himself back?