sittingbison said:remember thaat in the PRR forum clinic related comments are not allowed, so some of that will be coded to mean "doper"
They aren't?
Clearly, full ***, mutant and alien mean something totally different over there.
sittingbison said:remember thaat in the PRR forum clinic related comments are not allowed, so some of that will be coded to mean "doper"
Nathan12 said:It has started, like it started with Armstrong.
sittingbison said:and they get reported, deleted, and sometime a ban is issued.
Today's?Miburo said:Wow i'm stunned, belgian newspaper is calling out Froome on the fact that he never mentioned the astma issue in his book.
Franklin said:... And no, neither Scienceiscool nor me are very sympathetic to this guy. But once again something pretty harmless is being blown up. Asthma is a blanket term for bronchidal inflammation with several causes and several profiles. Some people need a puffer several times a day, others never have to touch one.
pastronef said:and in the Armstrong years, the clinic and twitter did not even exist. it just began after his comeback 2009.
the interwebs storm is beginning.
Michelle is reading everything, and getting mad and madderevery day
mikeoneill said:could be a red flag moment for walsh
if froome hasn't mentioned asthma before
rainman said:Or if Froome did mention it why did Walsh not say anything in the book? Did he agree not to? Either way something's not right about it.
andy1234 said:This Asthma stuff reminds me of the the BS spouted every time Armstrong scratched his @rse.
There are many things to be alarmed about, when it comes to Froome's performances, but this isn't one of them.
It's exercise induces Asthma FFS. Many athletes have some form of it, and treatment during activity is recommended.
Valid points simply get washed away in the sea of posts, obsessing over these irrelevant activities.
Discuss the contents of Froome's sock drawer by all means, but don't be surprised when the clinic is dismissed as a freak show.
andy1234 said:This Asthma stuff reminds me of the the BS spouted every time Armstrong scratched his @rse.
There are many things to be alarmed about, when it comes to Froome's performances, but this isn't one of them.
It's exercise induces Asthma FFS. Many athletes have some form of it, and treatment during activity is recommended.
Valid points simply get washed away in the sea of posts, obsessing over these irrelevant activities.
Discuss the contents of Froome's sock drawer by all means, but don't be surprised when the clinic is dismissed as a freak show.
“I must have touched some contaminated water somewhere in Africa. I probably had it for a year before I found it,” he said in 2011. “That just drained my immune system. I was always getting little colds and coughs, nothing serious, but it always kept me from being at 100-percent fitness.”
Read more at http://velonews.competitor.com/2013...bilharzia-parasite_295548#hlixEa6QoRc2pJhV.99
Froome’s girlfriend, Michelle Cound, responded to some messages on Twitter and explained that he has used it since he was a boy.
“No TUE required,” she wrote. “He has asthma, hence the coughing after exertion #duh #trolls.”
Sky confirmed that he has been using the inhaler since he was a teenager and that sometimes in races he administers Salbutamol.
Read more at http://velonews.competitor.com/2014...o-treat-his-asthma_331334#VL7gI94eqCQGKcwi.99
zigmeister said:....
What is interesting, is Froome knows exactly when to use his inhaler, he is approximately 5-15 minutes from a more extreme exertion/effort. The inhaler begins to take effect during that time and reach maximum I believe in 30 minutes. Have to look at the pharmacology again.
Point being, he didn't have asthma 45 minutes prior...decided right at that specific point to use it.....that is shady stuff. The half-life is 3-6hrs...so if he just took a dose near the beginning of the stage..no problems, plenty of drug still in his system to do what it needs to do.
Dear Wiggo said:The thing that gets me is the switch from bilharzia to asthma as the explanation for his coughing...
“A lot of people have seen the interviews I do after a race, part of the coughing that I have all the time – that’s part of that narrowing of my airways and that’s one of the reasons I use the inhaler.”
zigmeister said:Hate to quote myself fellas...but gheez.....did I hit this on the head of the nail with this statement. The timing of his use of the inhaler. He doesn't actually have any symptoms, but just decides to take a hit of the inhaler before the effort coming up and gives the 5-10 minutes it takes for it to really start to have a positive effect.
Now you are not going to tell me this isn't a PED advantage? I'll keep saying this over and over, let's just make the same argument for many other drugs, testosterone, thyroid medication etc..etc...performance is relative and unique for each person. If Froome can't either mentally, or physically get by without this drug, then how is this not a PED by definition? I will always maintain it is. Performance if relative to what an athlete is capable of physically doing on a measurable performance bases, compared to themselves taking something, then testing again. Not compared to 50 other guys and how fast they do a single climb for instance, with the help of some external chemical. Shoot, might as well add water to the list as well of PED.
Here is Froome's quote:
“I don’t use it every time I race, normally only when I know I’ve got a big effort coming up or something. It’s completely allowed, you don’t even need a TUE (Therapeutic Use Exemption) for it so it’s a bit of a surprise that everyone is talking about it.”
MartinGT said:I think the majority of posters see the ventolin as a none enhancing item.
But they see it as yet another blob on Skys so called transparency or lack of it.
Franklin said:Everyone coughs after going deep, not just Asthma patients. I'm very hesistant to call such a cough a symptom of Asthma.
Aha!Dear Wiggo said:It's called pursuiter's cough.