deviant said:
Maybe he does know what will trigger it?....big effort/climb coming up for example.
I made that same point in your response to me. He *thinks* he might have a reaction, fine, you take a hit. But my next paragraph said, hmmmm...why have we never seen him do this before? Or even brought up and mentioned?
Hawkwood said:
Exactly, you can be tested for the triggers, or you can work them out for yourself, it's not rocket science, it's lesson 1 of being an asthmatic. Air getting drier and colder going up a climb will be a trigger for some.
True, I've done the same. I didn't need a doctor to tell me what my condition was. Cold weather exercised induces asthma, allergy induced asthma. I take a few things when necessary, including singular 5mg/day. Same point as above. But I've been to the doctor for confirmation and testing. There are standard tests using inhalers to determine if you have certain conditions, that assumes you are experiencing them at that time though.
Will Carter said:
Ironically I did a Google for Salbutamol (Albuterol) weight loss, and looky here what I found:
http://www.livestrong.com/article/381131-albuterol-for-weight-loss/
Yes, nothing new, as well as using ephedrine, which guess what? Is allowed without a TUE like other items, as long as it is under certain limits. In weigh lifting/body building/fitness world it is a called the ECA stack. (Ephedrine, Caffeine, Aspirin) to increase metabolism and burn fat/calories while you "cut" weight to get lean.
Beech Mtn said:
Where is Froome's power meter?
He had a bike change for a flat late in the stage...gave him a new bike.
thehog said:
Yes, perfect point I've been making like a broken record over and over in many threads about defining what performance enhacement is. This guy agrees with me. Fascinating!
mrhender said:
Wada lifted the ban of salbutamol because studies showed no proof of performance enhancing effects.
http://www.runnerslife.co.uk/support-team/medical/asthma-inhalers
This study from Bisbebjerg Hospital in Denmark showed that it had no effect what so ever to the performance and the conclusion was:
Large amounts of salbutamol didn't give the athletes iron lungs, as the men in both groups huffed and puffed as they exercised. They all performed, and tired out, in similar ways. In fact, the only difference found in the subjects who used the salbutamol inhaler was that they retained drug levels in their urine that were, on average, nearly three times higher than the current WADA standards, levels which would have most certainly raised many questions and could have possibly excluded them from a sanctioned competition
I posted a similar study about 20 pages back. The point with these are that the "athletes" tested were normal, they didn't and were not diagnosed with asthma or any respiratory illness. And it didn't improve performance.
There is no study I could find for people like "Froome", who say they have asthma, to measure their performance with asthmatic reactions, and after they use the inhaler. That is the point. Obviously, there will be a marked difference and improvement, hence, why I always argue performance is relative. If you went from ZERO peformance due to asthma, take your inhaler hit, then you can perform and ride...that is performance enhancement. Making some arbitrary judgement and comparison against another person is meaningless...because there is no "normal".