sniper said:cheers.
did he do that seated?
MartinGT said:He was seated all the way.
He was dropped like a stone and then came back like superman. I suppose you still believe in Santa too
Zypherov said:MartinGT said:He was seated all the way.
He was dropped like a stone and then came back like superman. I suppose you still believe in Santa too
If Chris Froome was on the sauce then he wouldn't of got dropped in the first place.
I know you are just trying to parody the superfans, but the sad thing is many of them have so little knowledge of doping and cycling, and so little interest in educating themselves, that they actually believe things like that.Zypherov said:MartinGT said:He was seated all the way.
He was dropped like a stone and then came back like superman. I suppose you still believe in Santa too
If Chris Froome was on the sauce then he wouldn't of got dropped in the first place.
Beech Mtn said:Dawg was dropped pretty early, and was 50 seconds down on Quintana and Contador. Noted climber Peter Kennaugh paced Dawg a while. Then I guess he turned on the motor (or found a more favorable gradient), because he shot up through the groups like crazy. Blew past guys from the break (fair enough) and guys like Chaves/Yates. Only ones who could follow this seated acceleration extravaganza for any time at all were noted clean cyclists Alejandro Valverde and Michele Scarponi. Scarponi got dropped, then Valverde. Contador blew himself up trying to put time into Froome while he was dropped. Quintana went on, blew past Gesnik and won the stage.
Dawg did a lot of this sitting down, but he did get out the saddle to lose the sprint to Gesnik.
Anybody who spends money to sponsor a cycling team during this era of cycling is a fool.
therhodeo said:Given how he did that I'd be interested to see how much faster he rode that climb than the guys that were in front of him that he was chasing and passing.
Zypherov said:MartinGT said:He was seated all the way.
He was dropped like a stone and then came back like superman. I suppose you still believe in Santa too
If Chris Froome was on the sauce then he wouldn't of got dropped in the first place.
So why didn't he go for the win?I honestly believe he does it because he can. To give himself a challenge AND to make his renaissance that much more dramatic and entertaining. He's toying with his opponents. It's as if he knows he can get away with falling off of the back and then returning triumphantly as the Anglo announcers hoot and holler over his magnificence
Angliru said:Zypherov said:MartinGT said:He was seated all the way.
He was dropped like a stone and then came back like superman. I suppose you still believe in Santa too
If Chris Froome was on the sauce then he wouldn't of got dropped in the first place.
I honestly believe he does it because he can. To give himself a challenge AND to make his renaissance that much more dramatic and entertaining. He's toying with his opponents. It's as if he knows he can get away with falling off of the back and then returning triumphantly as the Anglo announcers hoot and holler over his magnificence.
ontheroad said:A mystifying performance that needs to be analysed. Such a curious way of riding has Froome and if this TT method of riding up mountains and ignoring what is going on around you is so effective you'd wonder why nobody thought of it before now. Sometimes I just can't make head nor tail of Froome.
PremierAndrew said:Angliru said:Zypherov said:MartinGT said:He was seated all the way.
He was dropped like a stone and then came back like superman. I suppose you still believe in Santa too
If Chris Froome was on the sauce then he wouldn't of got dropped in the first place.
I honestly believe he does it because he can. To give himself a challenge AND to make his renaissance that much more dramatic and entertaining. He's toying with his opponents. It's as if he knows he can get away with falling off of the back and then returning triumphantly as the Anglo announcers hoot and holler over his magnificence.
That would maybe be a valid argument if he was winning. But he's not.
Angliru said:PremierAndrew said:That would maybe be a valid argument if he was winning. But he's not.
Not yet. The point I believe is to make the eventual overall victory that much more dramatic and amazing. Like the Phoenix bursting from the ashes of defeat to snatch victory from his opponent.
2008885 said:So why didn't he go for the win?I honestly believe he does it because he can. To give himself a challenge AND to make his renaissance that much more dramatic and entertaining. He's toying with his opponents. It's as if he knows he can get away with falling off of the back and then returning triumphantly as the Anglo announcers hoot and holler over his magnificence