roundabout said:it's a public vote, click and find out
I already voted so dont think i can see it.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
roundabout said:it's a public vote, click and find out
Miburo said:I don't think it's fair for the Contador fans to bash Froome for saying this.
First of all did he really say that? Or did a journalist put the words in his mouth? Never trust an interview like that. I need to hear him say it, otherwise it has not much value for me.
Second of all. What did Contador say? "If i've good legs i fear no one." What's the difference with Froome's statement?
Zam_Olyas said:I already voted so dont think i can see it.
movingtarget said:Really, it's not that hard.
Publicus said:Click on the vote total to see who voted for each.
Roderick said:The guy can't even sit properly on his bike.
Publicus said:And yet he someone manages to win--OFTEN. Hard to not like Froome (based upon interviews I've personally seen of him). And he's a competitor, which I personally always like. I hope Contador is where he needs to be to make it a competitive race. I don't want a coronation of either--I want one of them to earn it.
Publicus said:And yet he someone manages to win--OFTEN. Hard to not like Froome (based upon interviews I've personally seen of him). And he's a competitor, which I personally always like. I hope Contador is where he needs to be to make it a competitive race. I don't want a coronation of either--I want one of them to earn it.
Roderick said:In interviews he is mostly a friendly gentleman, but they are only interviews. The way he tried to humiliate Sir Wiggo last Tour says more than all the things in the interviews
Ferminal said:lol, I take ~10% of polls seriously. I had to vote to see the results. I can easily choose either and would have gladly voted for a "both" option, or a "anyone but Purito". I think ultimately whoever wins will do it in style and will no doubt be the strongest. I guess that makes me a true fan of neither, because to hope for one to win is to wish defeat on the other. Personally though I find it hard to prefer one over the other, they are both world class and exciting. As the incumbent, Contador holds the higher position, but it will all be on the line.
Publicus said:And yet he someone manages to win--OFTEN. Hard to not like Froome (based upon interviews I've personally seen of him). And he's a competitor, which I personally always like. I hope Contador is where he needs to be to make it a competitive race. I don't want a coronation of either--I want one of them to earn it.
Cimber said:Would be fun if a whole other rider won to be honest. After all that hype about Froome vs. Contador.
mr. tibbs said:I hate to admit it, but I think I don't like Froome b/c SKY. Imagine if he were going into the Tour as number one favorite wearing an FDJ or Lampre kit. He'd be a forum hero.
Taxus4a said:I followed and liked Froome before he sign for SKy, so I dont have that problem.
Anyway, the hate of a lot of cycling fans with SKy, hard accusations that are likely falses, and a lot of my favourites riders finishing there, make me like sky as well, at least in some ways.
But , to like Saxo more than SKy, I cannot understand.
Anyway I am happy with the poll.
Taxus4a said:I followed and liked Froome before he sign for SKy, so I dont have that problem.
Anyway, the hate of a lot of cycling fans with SKy, hard accusations that are likely falses, and a lot of my favourites riders finishing there, make me like sky as well, at least in some ways.
But , to like Saxo more than SKy, I cannot understand.
Anyway I am happy with the poll.
Angliru said:I tend to have a voracious appetite for all things related to professional cycling and road cycling in general such that I read virtually all the English language magazines that are available. Unfortunately they have for the most part decided that what the fans want is Sky, Sky and more Sky. You will find in every issue at least 3-4 articles on Sky or their riders or even their former riders that have left to ride for other teams. Radio Shack and BMC fill up the remainder of pages with a very, very minimal amount left for the other teams and riders at the top of the sport. Add to that the statements from Sky management that they have revolutionized the sport, that all of the other teams are copying their techniques, that they intend on dominating the sport and you have every reason to root for anyone but them. They (management primarily)have made themselves out to be the favorites making everyone else the underdogs all without a bit of humility. Froome himself seems to be a very humble person in interviews and I don't necessarily root against him as I do against the continued success of his team and the subsequent effect of having them rammed down my throat by the English language media.
forkboy84 said:I'm from Britain, so yeah. I like to see British cyclists do well as it raises the profile of the sport in this country to point where maybe one day we'll get more races shown on council telly. Maybe they'll even show the national championships live one day And so Froome being successful has the potential to benefit me.
Also, while people are (I think understandably) extremely cynical of Sky's proclamations of being clean while looking very dominant at times, it's worth remembering that Chris Froome has yet to actually be banned for an illegal substance. Unlike some others in the poll. Which at least makes him marginally more sympathetic in my eyes.
King Boonen said:I just want to see the best guy win.
I want an exciting race, but I don't mind if Sky get Froome to the line using their usual tactics, that's racing.
forkboy84 said:I'm from Britain, so yeah. I like to see British cyclists do well as it raises the profile of the sport in this country to point where maybe one day we'll get more races shown on council telly. Maybe they'll even show the national championships live one day And so Froome being successful has the potential to benefit me.
Also, while people are (I think understandably) extremely cynical of Sky's proclamations of being clean while looking very dominant at times, it's worth remembering that Chris Froome has yet to actually be banned for an illegal substance. Unlike some others in the poll. Which at least makes him marginally more sympathetic in my eyes.