BroDeal said:Cyclists doping for years, all through the EPO and blood doping era? Nah, couldn't happen.
Not if they are native English speakers, no way.
BroDeal said:Cyclists doping for years, all through the EPO and blood doping era? Nah, couldn't happen.
I would be interested in that as well. Need to only look at the Olympic events as there was a specific strategy to concentrate on those.Ferminal said:What percentage of events did they win in those meets, 08/09 - 11/12? Would you call that dominance?
On one side there are the guys that say 'how can someone be doping if they have never failed a test' and on the other there are people that regurgitate the same sh!t 'jokes' and actually think they are funny.Hugh Januss said:Not if they are native English speakers, no way.
Was watching a bit on the BBC yesterday, I sensed the presenter - he also does the F1 - was getting suspiscious too, but it soon went over to the marginal gains theory. Marginal gains are tenths' of a second over 4k in my opinion, not two full seconds or one and a half.Darryl Webster said:I doubt very much any "program" they might be employing is going to be exposed any time soon and have genuine suspicion IOC/ UCI would collude to cover up any evidence.
Not even in at the hight of Russian/ GDR powers has any team dominated to this degree and I'm left wondering if Brailsford has ever heard the expression " you can have to much of a good thing"? .
Intelligent conversation on the topic is all but impossible over here in the UK such is the waive of jingoistic patriotism.
Is there a "program"?...well if there isn't it will be an absolute first in a cycling team performing this well and other nations coaches and staff will be well aware of this.
I sense some pretty strong resentment building up.
Wow, it doesn't get any better than this. Brits will say 'sour loser', critics will say something differently.Bauge said:"From Beijing you were silver in 2008 and the same in the world championships the following year and you prepared for four years for today. So how did you prepare?"
A slight sub text but yesterday the French cycling federation's national technical director Isabelle Gautheron pondered the startling success of the Great Britain team on the track. She was clear that no doping innuendo was implied and Baugê]"If I understand, you'll relax for the next four years and then when it comes to Rio you'll be on top again, right?"[/B]
"Not at all," replied Kenny. "The Games is the main one for us but for me, I still want to win world championships. They mean a lot for me as a rider. So I'll just go forward."
I'll stick with the bold part. With due respect of course.JimmyFingers said:This performance does not come from out of nowhere, so either GB has been doping for years, since 2004 when Wiggins and Hoy won gold, or they are this good
Fearless Greg Lemond said:If I am correct, there have been 7 track cycling events? The Brits taking 5 gold, one bronze and one DQ wich they were the clear favourites for?
Wonder why road cycling fans don't take track cycling serious.
Wallace and Gromit said:I'm surprised no-one has mentioned this, but Laura Trott won the flying lap in the Omnium, beating Clara Sanchez, a specialist sprinter, by 0.001s.
Why is Trott not getting the Clancy treatment?
gooner said:Don't know if it has been posted yet but here is the video of Bauge and Kenny in the press conference afterwards.
http://www.telly.com/6YVQE?fromtwitvid=1
Wallace and Gromit said:I'm surprised no-one has mentioned this, but Laura Trott won the flying lap in the Omnium, beating Clara Sanchez, a specialist sprinter, by 0.001s.
Why is Trott not getting the Clancy treatment?
barn yard said:must be those new helmets
Not trying to bully you here but maybe the results in China were a little too crazy for UCI/IOC [even for them] and cut back the contenders per country? I mean, a UK 1 - 2 in several events was even too much for those at UCI headquarters? You have to keep it a little bit real.JimmyFingers said:I think that's unfair: the UCI/IOC or whoever butchered the track programme so no Madison, Points race, Individual pursuit or Kilo, all of which have instead been condensed into one event, the Omnium, to be contested by one rider from each country. This makes GB's dominance even more stark than it was in Beijing. It has also made the programme very sprint heavy, with 3 marquee events in the team sprint, match sprint and keirin, and taken out the endurance events, which really favours GB's strengths on the track too. Watch a World Championship meet for more variety and much greater spread of medals
barn yard said:that was an absolutely disgusting sight
Did the elusive Peter Keen kick one of your kittens at some point in the past?Darryl Webster said:Well, well, well, this is interesting. GlaxoSmithKline are involved in medical control at the Olympics ( you may have seen there TV adds here in the uk)...and guess what..Peter Keen, widely held responsible for setting BC cycling on the road to were they are now and Special Adviser to UK Sports now works for GlaxoSmithKline. All pure coincidence of course...move along now..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_RJ9QPG70U&feature=share
Wallace and Gromit said:I'm surprised no-one has mentioned this, but Laura Trott won the flying lap in the Omnium, beating Clara Sanchez, a specialist sprinter, by 0.001s.
Why is Trott not getting the Clancy treatment?
Wallace and Gromit said:Not if you like seeing one's representatives dishing it out to the Jonny Foreigners, which is the true purpose of international sport. You obviously don't like what you're seeing, but it's day 4 of the track competition, so you maybe ought to consider turning the telly off when such "disgusting" sights are about to present themselves ie whenever any GB kit takes to the track.
So you serious think that Laura Trott, aged 20, and a world class rider since she was promoted to the senior team aged 18 is part of some team-wide master doping strategy?
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Not trying to bully you here but maybe the results in China were a little too crazy for UCI/IOC [even for them] and cut back the contenders per country? I mean, a UK 1 - 2 in several events was even too much for those at UCI headquarters? You have to keep it a little bit real.
Read a comment of Theo Bos - not a bad track racer in his days - stating 'I am convinced I am just as talented as Chris Hoy, but the British preparation is an expample to many sports'.
When I took a quick look at the Worlds of april this year it's amazing how the Aussies are underperforming now?
mb2612 said:I think there is a team wide doping strategy, yes.
Avoriaz said:Did the elusive Peter Keen kick one of your kittens at some point in the past?
Wallace and Gromit said:Out of interest, what sort of dope do you think is involved? Given the build of the GB ladies, I would think that there's not much testosterone going their way. Jason Kenny is also curiously skinny.
Cancellator said:IF there is a doping strategy for the entire GB track squad, the sad truth is that it will never possibly come to light.
The PR damage would simply be too great, millions of pounds will go down the drain, etc. My guess is that IF they are using something, it's either untraceable or they are conspiring with the authorities so that no positives will come up, ever.
Wallace and Gromit said:Out of interest, what sort of dope do you think is involved? Given the build of the GB ladies, I would think that there's not much testosterone going their way. Jason Kenny is also curiously skinny.