The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Even in the older days, you had Gerald Ciolek winning a bunch sprint in the Deutschland Tour before he became U23 world champion, and Thomas Dekker competing at the Olympics and U23 WC in the same season.
For me the races have never been about crowning the very best U23 riders, so I don't mind a rule change, but only having conti riders sounds like taking it a step too far. Perhaps limiting it to riders who are in the first year at a WT team could be an idea.
An excellent decision by the UCI. Go a step further and change the under 23's to under 21's.
OK, bit of backing the event that is in your country, but in terms of landmarks per kilometre the final stage trumps pretty much everything except possibly the (non 2024) final stage of TdF; it was in the highest category of race possible; it usually attracted more comment here than many other WWT events; and not much wrong with the standard of palmares:Prestigious?
Yeah dude, throw everyone who isn't ready at 21 out of cycling basically. Jesus christ, just think. The amount of talent that would be lost with such a change is insane, and for absolutely no good reason.
Good. U23 has always been a fake category, but it serves well to develop young riders. Pros don't need to play in the sandbox. This should also strengthen the official development teams.Riders on World Tour and Pro Conti teams won't be able to ride the U23 Worlds and European championships from next year
For your information, 47 riders who were third- or fourth-year U23s last year made their pro debuts this year, including the likes of Ryan, Busatto, Foldager, Lamperti, Lecerf, Staune-Mittet and De Pretto. Do tell me where those riders should have gone to develop last year had they been ineligible for the U23 category. And don't argue they should have gone to a random continental team, you know as well as I do that the facilities there tend to be nowhere near what they are on the better U23 teams.What talent is lost? Riders are entering the pro peleton at an earlier age, so it makes sense to change the age categories. I'd also change the young jersey categories in stage races to under 23.
So for major championships juniors are 16 to 18, and the under 21 is 19 to 21.
For your information, 47 riders who were third- or fourth-year U23s last year made their pro debuts this year, including the likes of Ryan, Busatto, Foldager, Lamperti, Lecerf, Staune-Mittet and De Pretto. Do tell me where those riders should have gone to develop last year had they been ineligible for the U23 category. And don't argue they should have gone to a random continental team, you know as well as I do that the facilities there tend to be nowhere near what they are on the better U23 teams.
You can move the goalposts all you want, but your previous posts very much read like they're referring to the U23 category as a whole.My original post was referring to the Under 23 World's Championship and the UCI excluding WP and Pro-Conti riders from competing in this category. I am in full agreement with this decision. I then extrapolated that as younger riders are entering the peleton, then you could consider a change to the age categories for both major championship and for the young riders jersey in the pro peleton. Hence, my suggestion for the under 23 category at major championhips to consider changing it to under 21's, and in the WT changing the young jersey's to under 23.
You can move the goalposts all you want, but your previous posts very much read like they're referring to the U23 category as a whole.
It also makes zero sense to keep every current U23 race open to third- and fourth-year U23s, except for the championships.
No, you're right, the women's race has become pretty prestigious with a consistently good startlist. I was being harshOK, bit of backing the event that is in your country, but in terms of landmarks per kilometre the final stage trumps pretty much everything except possibly the (non 2024) final stage of TdF; it was in the highest category of race possible; it usually attracted more comment here than many other WWT events; and not much wrong with the standard of palmares:
The parcours left much to be desired (despite passing within 200m of my house), and there was a degree of predictability (final hills in Colchester and Maldon meant that at least is was a sprint that needed to be worked at). It was a keynote event for the British teams, and while not really a main season goal for the top names, they didn't refuse to attend.
- 2024
WIEBES Lorena
KOOL Charlotte
KOPECKY Lotte- 2023
KOOL Charlotte
DYGERT Chloe
DEIGNAN Elizabeth- 2022
WIEBES Lorena
BALSAMO Elisa
NORSGAARD Emma- 2021
not run
- 2020
not run
- 2019
WIEBES Lorena
BALSAMO Elisa
LABECKI Coryn- 2018
WILD Kirsten
VOS Marianne
BALSAMO Elisa- 2017
LABECKI Coryn
HENTTALA Lotta
BRENNAUER Lisa- 2016
WILD Kirsten
KESSLER Nina
KIRCHMANN Leah
So not the word I would have chosen for it, but not unreasonable claim for the press of the nation it is in to make.
No Civiglio in Il Lombardia
![]()
Giro di Lombardia senza Civiglio, il sindaco: «Da lì non si passa»
Nessuna deroga in vita della gara in programma il 12 ottobrewww.laprovinciadicomo.it
But no evidence that the routes currently shown in Tweets are anything other than "Well I guess this is an option in that case"
Edit: I see now that the newspaper article is three weeks old, so old news, but some Twitter activity over a La Flamme Rouge prediction last night:
![]()
Still lacks the Muro di Sormano, because Bambi.That was the guess that got many Twitterers irate: This is the actual route, announced this morning:
View: https://x.com/laflammerouge16/status/1835983325472723335
Happier?
They surley will go back to Sormano at some point? There are much worse decsents that are used. IMO the route from 2018 was the best. As far as Bergamo, the 2016 route was savage.Still lacks the Muro di Sormano, because Bambi.
Might ruin plans for a lot of things. UCI eventually decides the calendar. Maybe IOC can push the road race to the end of the month, which gives TDF more time, for example to finish TDF the 16th of July 2028.So the 2028 Olympics are supposed to take place from the 14th on July until the 30th, ruining the plans of of ASO for the Tour.
That said, Tour in August and the Giro just a bit later than usual wouldn't be bad at all...
I think they are also worried about TV ratings, mainly international ones, if the Olympics take place at the same time.Might ruin plans for a lot of things. UCI eventually decides the calendar. Maybe IOC can push the road race to the end of the month, which gives TDF more time, for example to finish TDF the 16th of July 2028.
Might ruin plans for a lot of things. UCI eventually decides the calendar. Maybe IOC can push the road race to the end of the month, which gives TDF more time, for example to finish TDF the 16th of July 2028.
tbf Los Angeles is in a different time zone (9 hours) than Europe. all the competitions will not clash with the TDF stages
tbf Los Angeles is in a different time zone (9 hours) than Europe. all the competitions will not clash with the TDF stages