Giro d'Italia Giro d'Italia 2025 Route: Speculation, Rumours and Announcements

Page 36 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Magnier has already said he's unlikely to finish the race, Pluimers has Zijlaard ahead of him for the flat sprints. Obviously it's marginal in the second half of the poll but I would have Kanter (you can bet Astana will try to get UCI points for the points classification) and Strong in there.
The only recent interview I've seen with Magnier is:


“Whether I finish the Giro, we don’t know yet. That partly depends on how things go, especially because the final week is very tough. We’ll decide that when the time comes.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
The only recent interview I've seen with Magnier is:

I thought I'd seen an interview where he said he would prioritise the French nationals (they are back in the Vendée this year, great route for him) but I can't find it now so don't quote me on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Apr 12, 2025
1
1
15
Tudor's team looks pretty good if you ask me: Storer might be one of the top climbers in the race, Pluimers and Zijlaard for the sprints, Brenner for a stage win from the break.
Plus, Hirschi hasn't ridden a GT in almost three years and his last two (Tdf 21 and TdF 22) were dreadful.
Storer looked really impressive to me during the Tour of the Alps.
However, according to the data available at Watts2win, Storer's performances do not seem impressive, at all.
Storer (2025): https://watts2win.eu/cyclist/1375/performance

They actually look like Adam Yates' data (and we all agree that he's not having a good season so far): https://watts2win.eu/cyclist/819/performance
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Will you do a preview this year?
No. @Eshnar did his last one in 2023. @Devil's Elbow did it last year, and he has said he will do it again this year. But RCS has been very slow with the publication of the official information, so it's delayed.
13 days before the race starts and we still don't have the roadbook, climb profiles or finish maps (and it's not remotely likely we will be getting them today or tomorrow either). Unlike last year I've started working on the stage host introductions in advance which should help, but it's still going to be a hectic week and a bit to get the stage by stage analysis done in time...
If stage 1 is ready, I think it'd be good to post that thread before the full analysis.
 
Asiago stage having an intermediate sprint in Possagno, where Bocca di Forca starts - pisses me off an unreasonable amount.

ForcaS.gif


Bocca di Forca - Grappa - Bassano -Foza - is an absolute nobrainer here.
Would still have to go up the 'meh' side of Grappa no? I'm pretty sure they are doing the route they are doing due to financial reasons, I could be wrong..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Would still have to go up the 'meh' side of Grappa no? I'm pretty sure they are doing the route they are doing due to financial reasons, I could be wrong..
KDN2ugV.png


No, Bocca di Forca joins this side of Grappa. The top of BdF is very close to the first peak of the Grappa profile below, which would can used as the descent of BdF. It joins the classical side just under the top.


GrappaSE.gif
 
The stage with San Pellegrino in Alpe mid stage could be harder than expected because it comes right after the ITT.
IMO the big problems are stage 14 and stage 15 being so bad and the meh Aosta stage. The Grappa stage having the intermediate stage in Possagno, where the hardest side of Bocca di Forca starts, is just taking the piss, at that point they are trolling the hardcore fans.
RCS giving the Bormio stage over the Midtirolo only 3 out of 5 starts tells you it is easy, but it could at least result in more gc action the previous day, someone could attack from further out.
They didn't have to change much to have made this version one of the best in later years.

Abetone as stage finish instead of Castelnovo ne'Monti (and some more climbs earlier at that stage).
Bormio stage could have had same start and finish (or to Bormio 2000), just a different route.
Champoluc and Finestre stage should have changed days. And different route to Champoluc.

One different stage finish, one change of days and perhaps a very small change of stage finish. Otherwise just change the route between start and finish. And this would have been at least a 8/10 route.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
They didn't have to change much to have made this version one of the best in later years.

Abetone as stage finish instead of Castelnovo ne'Monti (and some more climbs earlier at that stage).
Bormio stage could have had same start and finish (or to Bormio 2000), just a different route.
Champoluc and Finestre stage should have changed days. And different route to Champoluc.

One different stage finish, one change of days and perhaps a very small change of stage finish. Otherwise just change the route between start and finish. And this would have been at least a 8/10 route.
Giuspessa instead of wrong side Mortirolo and Bocca di Forca-Grappa-Foza-Asiago and you have 3 queen stage worthy stages and you can probably go slightly easier in Aosta or San Valentino without changing any of the start or finish locations.

It is kinda hard to make better stages in the first 2 weeks if you keep the finish locations the same tbh. Maybe Castelraimondo can get Monto San Vicino at cresting at like 15km to go but that's about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Giuspessa instead of wrong side Mortirolo and Bocca di Forca-Grappa-Foza-Asiago and you have 3 queen stage worthy stages and you can probably go slightly easier in Aosta or San Valentino without changing any of the start or finish locations.

It is kinda hard to make better stages in the first 2 weeks if you keep the finish locations the same tbh. Maybe Castelraimondo can get Monto San Vicino at cresting at like 15km to go but that's about it.
If they did what I said, they could even have dropped Monte Grappa (or the San Valentino stage) and it would still have been a great route. It would have been a bit backloaded, but you would still have:

- A sterrato stage.
- San Pellegrino in Alpe - Abetone, basically the little brother of Mortirolo - Aprica.
- A Bormio 2000 stage with Carlo Magno, Tonale and Gavia.
- Finestre - Sestriere
- A Champoluc stage finish with at least Saint-Panthaelon first, then the combo of Arlaz, Tzecore and Joux.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
I love how Tudor's announcement for some reason also includes a passive-aggressive comment bit about Hirschi at the end of it. https://www.tudorprocycling.com/post/heading-to-our-second-giro

Notably absent from the final lineup is Marc Hirschi, who was originally slated to participate. Both he and the team had high hopes for his Giro debut, but recent performances at the Ardennes Classics showed he isn’t currently in shape to contend for the Maglia Rosa in the opening week. “I’m really disappointed not to be racing the Giro,” Hirschi said. “It’s a beautiful race, one that makes me dream and that I was excited to debut in. It’s frustrating not to be at the level we had planned for.”
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Notably absent from the final lineup is Marc Hirschi, who was originally slated to participate. Both he and the team had high hopes for his Giro debut, but recent performances at the Ardennes Classics showed he isn’t currently in shape to contend for the Maglia Rosa in the opening week. “I’m really disappointed not to be racing the Giro,” Hirschi said. “It’s a beautiful race, one that makes me dream and that I was excited to debut in. It’s frustrating not to be at the level we had planned for.”
Hirschi is yet again disappointing. He has in no way lived up to the promise from the great 2020 season. Last year was good, but this year he is back on a lower level.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan