- Jan 11, 2010
- 15,615
- 4,551
- 28,180
kurtinsc said:Well... if he wheel rides with the leaders to the top of climbs, one would think he'd be good enough with the extra energy he'd have saved to take his share of any bonuses available.
Correct, irrespective of conditions and what other teams did, they rode well as a team; and that is what Cadel needs over the next three weeks.Dekker_Tifosi said:BMC did an excellent TTT
Dekker_Tifosi said:BMC did an excellent TTT, I expected them to lose more. I just don't think the wind was that much of a factor here.
There was also more rain for the teams that started later, for example Sky. There are just too much factors to say the external influences where decisive.
The thing that is most decisive is still the strength of the teams... so I see this, without falls, as a fair result whatsoever
Cobblestones said:The rainy part moved from the second part of the course (for early teams) to the first part (for later teams). So early teams who shed a lot of riders got a disadvantage over later teams who could use up some of the weaker guys on the bad patches.
Anyway, only team out is Astana with 6 riders?
Dekker_Tifosi said:BMC did an excellent TTT, I expected them to lose more. I just don't think the wind was that much of a factor here.
There was also more rain for the teams that started later, for example Sky. There are just too much factors to say the external influences where decisive.
The thing that is most decisive is still the strength of the teams... so I see this, without falls, as a fair result whatsoever
issoisso said:It's Basso. He's the slowest sprinter in the peloton. Karpets can beat him for god's sake.
kurtinsc said:Even on an uphill finish? Or are we thinking more about flat/downhill finishes after a climb?
sportzchick said:BMC couldnt do no more TBH - just so damm fustrating (being laughed at by the anti Aussie brigade isnt helping)
