Interesting - now I've been called a troll, and told my thread is stupid. Well, I did start the thread with the idea of getting some conversation going, but I don't think that makes me a troll.
As for being suspicious - hey - didn't we learn anything from the Lance years - after all, wasn't he the most tested athlete in history? I was willing to give the peloton the benefit of the doubt at the time. Later, it all started coming out, and it became apparent that pretty much everybody in the pro peloton was juicing.
Ney the Viking said:
There is a thing i dont quite understand that I hope you can help me with that relates to a stage like this.
Effort at going faster is not linear, right? So De Gendt is spending a bit more effort earlier on the stage, and the chasers has to go faster than him later on to catch him. So what costs more energy? Just going by my own nonpowermetered/HR-monitored bike experienced i would say the latter is harder (assuming they have to finish the stage in the same time). I know this ignores drafting etc, but that shouldnt be TOO important on a proper mountainstage.
So basically I dont understand why it is so OMG-Surprising that a steady speed De Gendt takes time on GC contenders having to race the last part of the stage a lot faster than De Gendt in order to catch him.
Why was this OMG surprising, eh? At the speeds these guys climb (>12mph), drafting is still a big deal. You have a large group trying to get a leader back. That leader attacked a small but elite group and gapped them. Now that leader has no draft. He has been out front for a long time, with a much smaller group - therefore the larger group is logically fresher, and should be bringing him back. But they are not.
Did De Gendt ride well tactically? Yes. Does that mean he didn't dope? No. Nor do I agree at all with the posters who say that negative riding in the pink jersey group kept the gap alive. Rodriquez and Basso also stood to lose a great deal, and both were riding to win. But their teams were spent, and so were they.
So why wasn't De Gendt spent and wasted? Everybody else in the peloton seemed to be. There was more fatigue rolling off their backs then you get off a RAAM rider on day 4. He was highly placed. For him to NOT be spent and wasted almost as much as these other guys means one of two things, I think. Either he is a better talent than the rest of the guys who were at the Giro this year, or he found some refreshment somewhere.
I can see the possibility that this guy is still young enough that he really had not tried as hard as the others. It is possible that he really did have enough, and took the advantage when he saw it. If that is true, we will be seeing more of him in future GTs. But I still believe there is good reason to be suspicious. We'll see.