I did not suggest that, or imply it in any way. Thank you.
What i said was, after the pegasus situation, where they had no sponsor, after the astana sponsor situation where apparently riders werent getting paid, and after the leopard situation where they had no sponsor and ended up taking another teams sponsor, that the auditors, deloitte, may not take such a relaxed attitude with privately funded teams as they had in the past.
I nowhere suggested that GE was a shakey operation like Pegasus.
You have either misunderstood what I was saying (and were the only one who misunderstood) or you have deliberately mis read.