The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Echoes said:
The fridge in the blue trees said:Contador is the coward not Valverde.
Instead of taking responibility, he wants to drop Froome, ok, ride, he hides behind Purito and Valverde. They didn't help!!!
Plus, why did he let Zaugg chase Moreno+Caruso? To drop Froome having those 2 ahead was the best thing that could happen. 2 guys that will ride for Purito keeping Froome away, just give them enough advantage before. But no, caught way too early since Zaugg had to keep them close. AFraid of not being able to follow Purito? Coward.
contador977 said:I dont like how Valverde is riding. Sure he is strong. To just follow wheels and outsprint everyone is not the way Id want to win a Vuelta. At the same time, respect to Valverde for being able to follow attacks. I just dont appreciate him drafting the whole climb until the end, its a real slap in the face if Im a rival. Winning the Vuelta drafting up climbs and outsprinting Contador and Rodriquez is a bit of a cowardly move Id say.
He could've accomplished the same thing, and more, winning the stage.jaylew said:The #1 priority is not trying to get time on Froome. He wants to win. To do that he needs to get time on Contador.
cineteq said:He could've accomplished the same thing, and more, winning the stage.
I'm not missing any point. This is provided they have agreed to collaborate with each other more. Meaning Contador would've agreed to take 3rd place.BigMac said:You're missing the point, though. Nowhere would he have dropped Contador today. And would risk being counter-attacked and not having it to respond.
cineteq said:I'm not missing any point. This is provided they have agreed to collaborate with each other more. Meaning Contador would've agreed to take 3rd place.
naviman said:So why did Banesto not drop Indurain? Watching him was pretty boring imo
BigMac said:You're missing the point, though. Nowhere would he have dopped Contador today. And would risk being counter-attacked and not having the strenght to respond. Remember he attacked yesterday and shot himself in the foot, even though his attack was logical.
Netserk said::facepalm:
It was idiotic. End of.
Have only seen the last 6km of today's stage, but he played it right there. Cycling is about winning, not attacking/panache/pulling/pleasing the fans. I enjoy cynical riding with the aim for victory over dumb attacks (like Piti's yesterday) and dumb non-attacks (Piti many times).
cineteq said:I'm not missing any point. This is provided they have agreed to collaborate with each other more. Meaning Contador would've agreed to take 3rd place.
Contador attacked them because they didn't take turns. If anything Valverde is the one not to be trusted.jaylew said:Given that, sure, but he even said he didn't trust them. Why would he? They kept attacking.
The fridge in the blue trees said:Contador is the coward not Valverde.
Instead of taking responibility, he wants to drop Froome, ok, ride, he hides behind Purito and Valverde. They didn't help!!!
Plus, why did he let Zaugg chase Moreno+Caruso? To drop Froome having those 2 ahead was the best thing that could happen. 2 guys that will ride for Purito keeping Froome away, just give them enough advantage before. But no, caught way too early since Zaugg had to keep them close. AFraid of not being able to follow Purito? Coward.
cineteq said:Velverde: "It's true that maybe a little more collaboration would have served to distance Froome a bit more, but I did not trust Purito or Alberto"
http://www.ciclo21.com/15a-vuelta-espana-contador-purito-y-valverde-juegan-en-lagos/
So instead he loses an opportunity to win a stage and take more time on Froome. Now, rooting for Contador and Froome to get rid of him.