Armchair Cyclist
Moderator
So was that a disqualification that got reversed, or simply not registering the presence of the man who came in 5th?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Lombardia can change because doesn't have one but the difficulty should be similar, something like last year with consecutive climbs like a mountain stage is ridicoulos but also this year route is too hard.Netserk said:Well, what route of Lombardia is established in decades then?
Should Cipressa and Poggio be removed from MSR?
I am not sure what you want? do you want more sprints??Nirvana said:Lombardia can change because doesn't have one but the difficulty should be similar, something like last year with consecutive climbs like a mountain stage is ridicoulos but also this year route is too hard.Netserk said:Well, what route of Lombardia is established in decades then?
Should Cipressa and Poggio be removed from MSR?
If they'll take out of the MSR the Cipressa or the Poggio would be like when they took the Muur out of the Ronde finale, something terrible in my opinion.
Nibali was the best all rounder at the moment. He is enjoying a peak at the end of the year. Really nothing to do with the course which is usually a one for climbers. Yet Alaphilippe arrived in second.DFA123 said:Not really sure of you're point here. Designing a Lombardia that gives the best chance for an Italian to win, is basically designing a Lombardia that gives the best chance for Nibali to win - the two are the same thing. Just like 10-15 years ago the course was designed with Bartoli or Bettini in mind. It will be interesting to see how they will tweak in a couple of years to give Moscon the best chance of victory - probably will become a bit easier again.46&twoWheels said:Aru was nowhere to be found today
I don't think you're making peace with your statements
First you say: "italy organized the Lombardia for Nibali"
then you move the goalpost,when people showed you that Nibs was the strongest uphill,dowhill and in the last flat part.
"italy organized il Lombardia for the Italians"
Alaphilippe arrived 2nd though
[/u]
Of course Nibali still has to go out an win on the course, which is far from a certainty. It just devalues the race, like any race is devalued when it is designed with certain riders in mind.
I don't think that mountain stages of the Tour are more exciting than flat ones, in Peyragudes we had essentially 1,5 kms of action, we could have the same also with a flat stage and Huy finish at the end.Gigs_98 said:If routes wouldn't change the tour de france would probably be won by sprinters and most one day races would end in bunch sprints as well. Do you want this sport to become extremely boring, then not changing routes is the way to achieve that. But I think most people want to watch exciting races and therefore routes have to change
How come? From what I could see it didn't interfere with Pinot's lines, and as it was behind Nibali it didn't assist him either.Vesica said:The moment the camera-motor got in between Nibali and Pinot, Pinot was done. Very strange move imo from the moto.
Netserk said:Well, what route of Lombardia is established in decades then?
Should Cipressa and Poggio be removed from MSR?
If Nibali could add LBL and a Worlds (depending on the Innsbruck course) to his palmares next season, he'd be well up the list for all-time greats.Flat Out said:In the long interview after the race, Nibs confirms he is very interested in having a "classics" season, they will wait for the GT parcours to be ut before taking any decisions but he seemed rather convinced for the Ardennes and the WC. Cadel Evans was in the studio, he pointed out Vincenzo has nothing more to show in the GT having won all of them and he should really go hunting Classics to become one of the greatest of his generations, he spoke of him as being a bit like Mercxx which wade Nibs laugh!
I want that the routes established in decades (or in case of a race that usually change like Lombardia the charactericstic of the race) would be mantained and not altered only because an hard race is better. And i don't think that this common thought of the harder the better it's true, for example Paris-Tours only has two little bumps but always delivers, Liege with multiple côtes not.Escarabajo said:I am not sure what you want? do you want more sprints??Nirvana said:Lombardia can change because doesn't have one but the difficulty should be similar, something like last year with consecutive climbs like a mountain stage is ridicoulos but also this year route is too hard.Netserk said:Well, what route of Lombardia is established in decades then?
Should Cipressa and Poggio be removed from MSR?
If they'll take out of the MSR the Cipressa or the Poggio would be like when they took the Muur out of the Ronde finale, something terrible in my opinion.
Armchair cyclist said:I also read that Jan Bakelandts had a fall at the same place as De Plus and is described as seriously injured.
But if the sport changes, why should the routes not change. I guarantee you that the sport of cycling would die out routes would never change. I mean even positive aspects of routes you pointed out were actually changes. You want long TT's in the tour? Guess what, there was a two decades long tradition of tdf routes not having ITT's. There were usually hardly any mountains stages and the climbs were always extremely far away from the finish. Thank god they changed that or even in your beloved 80s/90s the tour would have been boring. It's a good thing that the lombardia route changed since actually not changing the route is what would really change this route. You want a classic for hilly riders? If you return to the old lombardia routes you will instead create a classic for sprinters. Only if the route gets adapted regularly the race can keep its prestige.Nirvana said:I want that the routes established in decades (or in case of a race that usually change like Lombardia the charactericstic of the race) would be mantained and not altered only because an hard race is better. And i don't think that this common thought of the harder the better it's true, for example Paris-Tours only has two little bumps but always delivers, Liege with multiple côtes not.Escarabajo said:I am not sure what you want? do you want more sprints??Nirvana said:Lombardia can change because doesn't have one but the difficulty should be similar, something like last year with consecutive climbs like a mountain stage is ridicoulos but also this year route is too hard.Netserk said:Well, what route of Lombardia is established in decades then?
Should Cipressa and Poggio be removed from MSR?
If they'll take out of the MSR the Cipressa or the Poggio would be like when they took the Muur out of the Ronde finale, something terrible in my opinion.
All the French teams ganging up on Moscon.GuyIncognito said:What was Vuillermoz yelling and gesturing to Moscon about as they came across the line?
silvergrenade said:All the French teams ganging up on Moscon.GuyIncognito said:What was Vuillermoz yelling and gesturing to Moscon about as they came across the line?
sir fly said:Nibali has perfetcted winning this race.
Looked like he knew the exact place and moment he'll drop the rivals.
Congrats.
A true relief to hear De Plus isn't seriously injured.
Tsss. Poor guys. Bakelants suffered a major injury here before I think.RedheadDane said:Turns out De Plus wasn't the only one who crashed in that corner.
DFA123 said:Not really sure of you're point here. Designing a Lombardia that gives the best chance for an Italian to win, is basically designing a Lombardia that gives the best chance for Nibali to win - the two are the same thing. Just like 10-15 years ago the course was designed with Bartoli or Bettini in mind. It will be interesting to see how they will tweak in a couple of years to give Moscon the best chance of victory - probably will become a bit easier again.46&twoWheels said:Aru was nowhere to be found today
I don't think you're making peace with your statements
First you say: "italy organized the Lombardia for Nibali"
then you move the goalpost,when people showed you that Nibs was the strongest uphill,dowhill and in the last flat part.
"italy organized il Lombardia for the Italians"
Alaphilippe arrived 2nd though
[/u]
Of course Nibali still has to go out an win on the course, which is far from a certainty. It just devalues the race, like any race is devalued when it is designed with certain riders in mind.