Publicus said:
That being said, I think Andy is already reading too much into what happened yesterday. He took it to mean that he is now the strongest climber. AC said going in that the Alps would not be decisive, that the winner of the stage might get a few seconds on the other contenders. That it would be a stage about fitness. Which is pretty much what happened.
Well everyone already knew he was one of the strongest climbers anyways - I think this stage win was mostly a boost for his moral. Last year he tried to drop Contador countless times and never succeeded, so this was really important psychologically, even if 10 seconds is not much.
On the other hand, I think it's delusional to think any of the GC contendors could gain more than 30 or 45 seconds on Contador at one time, so you have to collect all the seconds that you can.
BikeCentric said:
I don't see it happening. The fact remains that Andy is not a very good TT'er.
That is definitely true, but if you look at two similar ITT's then that might give Andy some hope:
1) The ITT of the 2007 Giro: Similar length (43 km) and profile to this year's and also the penultimate stage.
Granted, the field was not as strong as the Tour's this year, but still, Andy's result was pretty impressive: he came in 6th with 50 seconds on Zabriskie and 12 on Bruseghin, both really good time trialers. Schleck went into the ITT 2nd overall and was able to keep that place, even gain time on Di Luca (who was, in hindsight, probably doped).
2) The ITT of the 2008 Tour de France: exactly 53 km, also the penultimate stage, a little hillier though. While Andy's performance was not extraordinary (30th, 2 mins down on Evans and Menchov), we have to remember that he had absolutely nothing to gain or lose anymore, as he was in 12th place overall, over 10 minutes back before the ITT.
However, it is not Andy's performance in this specific ITT that I want to draw your attention to, but Carlos Sastre's: he came in 12th, roughly 30 seconds behind Evans and Menchov. Sastre was and still is not known as a good ITT'er, but he went into a relatively flat 53 km long ITT on the Tour's penultimate stage wearing yellow and he was able to hold on to it.
What I'm trying to say is that on long, flat ITT's at the very end of a GT, motivation and recovery play a very important role. If Andy goes into the ITT wearing yellow (of which there is a realistic chance IMO), and if he recovers well, then he can do much better than what one might expect of him.
Of course the odds are still against him, but I do think those are valid examples to prove that an extraordinary showing by Andy in the ITT is not that unlikely. The odds were also against Sastre back in 2008 (at least from what I expected), but he managed to hold on to 1 minute.
So if Schleck hais 1:30 on Contador (which would be another 50 seconds to what he already has), then he might be able to pull off a Sastre - depending on how Contador will do.
Angliru said:
I think Andy is getting a bit ahead of himself. I recall last year he said the very same thing, that he was the best climber in the world. If he actually still believe that was the case why did he wait so long to attack? I think he's playing with fire by making these silly public statements.
I wouldn't take his statements too seriously: I compare it to the comments of boxers previous to a match. You need to fire yourself up and try to destabilize the opponent as much as you can. He's trying to motivate himself, that's all I'd say. He needs to believe in himself, otherwise you can't win the Tour. So I'd be worried if he said "It was a nice stage win but I don't want to give it too much importance since it was only 2,1%. Alberto is still the strongest and I'm really scared for the Pyrenées."
He probably is scared for the Pyrenées, but you just don't say that, you need to be confident and if not then at least appear really confident.
Cerberus said:
I hope that's deliberate hyperbole. Andy is going to need 1-3 minutes to his GC competitors.
Yes I think that is much more accurate too.