• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Itzulia Basque Country 2024, April 1-6

Page 53 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
OK, after watching the crash again and again:

1. Landa went into that curve really on the limit.
2. Those on the outside of that curve, at the same speed (the first rider to crash, Remco, Vingegaard,...) had no chance as the curve went down on the outside, making those riders accelerate / having to undergo much greater G-forces in order to hold the curve. Some riders on the outside didn't crash because they braked immediately (not possible for e.g. Evenepoel anymore).
3. riders were crashing independently.
4. Remco was already having his back wheel uncontrolled / slipping before he decided he wouldn't hold it and it was better to go straight and hope for the best crashing in the grass in between rocks and trees.
5. Vingegaard crashed hard against that ditch, and his team mate hit him while on the ground. He really got the biggest blow.
 
I see some journo's on Twitter already criticizing the UCI and Itzulia for the route, I think that's such one-sided nonsense. I've cycled myself in Basque Country when I lived in Spain, it is fairly impossible to design a route in this geograhpy that doesn't contain curvvy, steep descents. If you want to take rider safety seriously, you also include the responsiblity of teams, DS and riders themselves in how much risk they are taking on these kind of terrain. If you want to be critical, I get the point that you need to put clearer demarcation of a dangerous corner coming up, but claiming that these kinds of descents shouldn't be in a race is just plain out impossible.

Hoping that all riders involved will be OK.


Can always count on journalists to come up with the absolute nutlow take, whenever something happens. Cycling journos seem annoyingly good at it too.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
I see some journo's on Twitter already criticizing the UCI and Itzulia for the route, I think that's such one-sided nonsense. I've cycled myself in Basque Country when I lived in Spain, it is fairly impossible to design a route in this geograhpy that doesn't contain curvvy, steep descents. If you want to take rider safety seriously, you also include the responsiblity of teams, DS and riders themselves in how much risk they are taking on these kind of terrain. If you want to be critical, I get the point that you need to put clearer demarcation of a dangerous corner coming up, but claiming that these kinds of descents shouldn't be in a race is just plain out impossible.

Hoping that all riders involved will be OK.
It was really unfortunate that the peloton did the climb in slow-mo and was super big before going all out on the descent. They went down the descent far faster than the break while being ~3 riders side-by-side when turning.
 
That sounds like a reward for the front riders for not crashing and a punishment for the peloton for crashing!
Certainly a point of view, but big picture all the conti riders in the front were well down on GC so none are going top 10,15 on GC and the group standings stay the same with everyone getting same time, good decision, causes zero arguments from teams in contention for the win
 
  • Like
Reactions: Escarabajo