Apparently it was all because he took the corners better 😂The official TDF Instagram page is full of comments fawning over Jonas and his ‘fantastic’ performance. Anyone suggesting that he is doping is met with hate. LOL.
Apparently it was all because he took the corners better 😂The official TDF Instagram page is full of comments fawning over Jonas and his ‘fantastic’ performance. Anyone suggesting that he is doping is met with hate. LOL.
People keep referencing 2020 as if Pogacar hasn't evolved as a rider since then. I'm not saying this wasn't an extraordinary performance from Vingegaard, I'm just questioning this sudden lowering of standards re: what Pogacar is capable of at his best.Well compared to everyone else he had a great day. He was nearly 1.5 minutes faster than any other GC rider, he put time into WvA at a faster rate than in 2020, and had Vingegaard not existed he would’ve had one of the biggest winning margins in Tour history at 3.6% of the winner’s time (Ullrich held the record of 4.0% from 1997). But then along came Vingegaard who put well over a minute into WvA in just 16km of rolling terrain followed immediately by climbing Cote de Domancy at 2096 VAM - on a TT bike. All en route to winning by a 5% margin. Pogacar wasn’t bad Vingegaard just hit a completely different level all of a sudden.
Maybe rewatch stage 5I'm someone who has literally no time for either Vingegaard or Pogacar, in fact ever since Jens Voigt upped sticks and retired no driver could really cause excitement anymore.
But seriously, this TT is just taking the mickey for me. A guy who failed to open more than a 10 second gap over two weeks suddenly goes over 4 secods faster a km than anyone else. Sorry, but my suspension of disbelief doesn't go that far, and even the seond place trounced the third place by quite a margin. And what to make of van Aerts? He slaved away like a fairground tart for days on end, always to complete exhaustion, and we are to believe that one rest day is enough to get him back to 3rd place material? I'm torn, but this day broke the tour for me. Unless either Vingegaard, Pogacar or WvA completely tank tomorrow, this result just looks a bit too much Ratiopharm to me.
Yeah I don't think you can compare say the gap to WvA vs Planche de Belles Filles. Pogacar has since then improved by quite a bit more than Van Aert.People keep referencing 2020 as if Pogacar hasn't evolved as a rider since then. I'm not saying this wasn't an extraordinary performance from Vingegaard, I'm just questioning this sudden lowering of standards re: what Pogacar is capable of at his best.
I have trouble believing that Pogacar did hit his numbers though. If that is the case and Vingegaard had this level in his back pocket the whole time, he's been sandbagging since Marie Blanque which seems like a very high risk approach given that something could've gone wrong at any time and he had no buffer at all. I don't see the point in judging Pogacar's effort relative to Rodriguez or anyone else.This doesn’t make any sense. I think he hit his numbers, he caught Rodriguez, he put 1:13 on Wout and more on all the other GC contenders. Jonas has been very good in ITTs and maybe could have nipped Wout last year for his first ever ITT victory, but this??? If he had performed the same relative to Wout as last year, Pogi would be in yellow by over a minute .
Because there's a few factors he cannot replicateSo why isn't he going to the ITT world championship? Because one can't use this kind of drug cocktail too often. It would be too hazardous for his health. He'll probably spend August doing some rehab program. They have copied the Armstrong method: only focus on the Dauphiné as preparation and the Tour as the main dish. The rest of the year doesn't matter.
Or he simply had a very good and refreshing rest day.I have trouble believing that Pogacar did hit his numbers though. If that is the case and Vingegaard had this level in his back pocket the whole time, he's been sandbagging since Marie Blanque which seems like a very high risk approach given that something could've gone wrong at any time and he had no buffer at all. I don't see the point in judging Pogacar's effort relative to Rodriguez or anyone else.
He was actually three seconds faster than Cavagna there.Vingegaard did a worse T1-T2 split than Cavagna.
Yeah I don't think you can compare say the gap to WvA vs Planche de Belles Filles. Pogacar has since then improved by quite a bit more than Van Aert.
Honestly it looks like me riding my old BMX bike when I was younger that only had one gear ring. Anytime I’d go too fast for the ring, it’d just keep spinning and spinning causing my knees to go out like that.Pog's gap to WvA is more impressive though yesterday because the ITT was much shorter. 1:13 gain over 22.4km is much more impressive than 1:31 over 36.2km. And Van Aert is a stronger rider now as well, all things considered.
And someone is going to have to explain the marginal aero gains here...
View: https://twitter.com/1ddenis1/status/1681407721298378753
It's like Froomey's elbows... with his knees!
oh yeah something went wrong, the alpha mutant created in a lab by JumboIf they really did believe that instead of privately expecting that Pog would limit his losses, something must've gone wrong.
He was actually 3'' faster. But your point still stands.Vingegaard did a worse T1-T2 split than Cavagna.
It's a bit like saying Pogacar did well relative to his competitors at Flanders the first time, or at MSR this year. He always believes he can do better the next time, and more often than not he does.Yeah I don't think you can compare say the gap to WvA vs Planche de Belles Filles. Pogacar has since then improved by quite a bit more than Van Aert.
Looks like he's shifting on the saddle or he's stretching the legs because he's got an uncomfortably narrow stance width for aero reasons.Pog's gap to WvA is more impressive though yesterday because the ITT was much shorter. 1:13 gain over 22.4km is much more impressive than 1:31 over 36.2km. And Van Aert is a stronger rider now as well, all things considered.
And someone is going to have to explain the marginal aero gains here...
View: https://twitter.com/1ddenis1/status/1681407721298378753
It's like Froomey's elbows... with his knees!
And that was the section that, in his own words, he went easier on!He was actually three seconds faster than Cavagna there.
Looks like he's shifting on the saddle or he's stretching the legs because he's got an uncomfortably narrow stance width for aero reasons.
It took about two seconds. Even if he did it 20 times that would only be 40 seconds out of a 33 minute effort. It's not like that would negate the effects of being aerodynamic, come on.It's a jarring visual impression considering the song & dance these teams make about aero work in the wind tunnel, along with positioning on the TT bike.
Then thig guy comes along & he's all over the place on the machine like a toddler, just pushing out inhumane watts & hammering the power down on descents, flats & climbs with zero recovery or apparent care for the stuff (like aero) which everyone says matters.
he was planning to ride 360 and did 380 right? Maybe they boosted his bike by 20W. (because there is no frigging way that you 'gain' 20 unexpected watts). Which resulted in him seeing a higher wattage then expected. Mayb the guy doesn't have a clue that his bike alone would get a top50 on the stage?Ladies and gents, it looks to be the best moderate duration effort we've seen. The Skeletor helped us here. According to his own words he was holding back and generated 380 watts (about 6.33 w/kg) between climbs (so this includes 7 flat minutes between T1 and T2). Then he went thermonuclear to the finish - likely doing 7.1 - 7.3 w/kg for 13.5 minutes. This gives us about 6.9 w/kg for 20+ minutes. On a TT bike. Thermonuclear.
Hard to estimate his wattage for the whole TT due to descents. If he was "holding back" (6.33) in the first 12 minutes it would be around 6.7 w/kg for 32.5 minutes. If we assume only 6 w/kg for the first part (intense uphill and some low wattage periods on descents) it's still around 6.55 w/kg for 32.5 minutes.
Every rider shifts on their TT bike at times, you're acting like he was sliding around on the saddle like a typical uncomfortable climber who can't TT. The thing that stands out to me is that Vingegaard is always planted on the saddle unlike most other rider his size who tend to have to sit a long way forward on their TT bikes. If anything that probably shows how dialed in his position is.It's a jarring visual impression considering the song & dance these teams make about aero work in the wind tunnel, along with positioning on the TT bike.
Then thig guy comes along & he's all over the place on the machine like a toddler, just pushing out inhumane watts & hammering the power down on descents, flats & climbs with zero recovery or apparent care for the stuff (like aero) which everyone says matters.
Some people will say he's the best descender ever but there's also a caveat there, namely the fact Vinge doesn't seem to require any recovery whatsoever at any point during the ITT.
The basic truth of what I saw was a dude in full attack mode for 22.4km's. Without taking a breather.
Uh, did you watch Itzulia?!
That's because the TT aerosuit is not always comfortable around the crotch.Pog's gap to WvA is more impressive though yesterday because the ITT was much shorter. 1:13 gain over 22.4km is much more impressive than 1:31 over 36.2km. And Van Aert is a stronger rider now as well, all things considered.
And someone is going to have to explain the marginal aero gains here...
View: https://twitter.com/1ddenis1/status/1681407721298378753
It's like Froomey's elbows... with his knees!