email to Paul Kimmage
Dear Mr. Kimmage,
My name is (redacted). I'm a regular on the cyclingnews forum using the forum name of "buckwheat." I've been very critical of Jonathan Vaughters' reluctance to speak in clear unequivocal terms about doping and I feel that this undermines his desire to be seen as an advocate of clean sport. Because of his lack of complete transparency on the issue, doubts have crept in regarding his commitment to a drug free competition, and also to the purity of his own team.
Jonathan Vaughters sent me a personal message and encouraged me to contact you in order to possibly allay my doubts, I suppose? I got your contact information from a guy known as "(redacted)" from the cyclingnews site. I was waiting for JV to provide this info but (redacted) suggested I just use your email.
I was hesitant to contact you for a couple of reasons. First, I think it's JV's obligation to speak candidly on the issue. Secondly, I was kind of confused that he volunteered for you to vouch for him, because you are a journalist who makes his living doing research, conducting interviews, and writing books and articles. I didn't think it was his place to volunteer for you to give away your bread and butter for free.
I realize it's presumptuous of me to ask this of you. Is there any comment you can give about Jonathan Vaughters and his anti doping stance and efforts? This is just for use on cyclingnews forums and I will only paraphrase your comments if you are so generous to provide them.
Finally, I would just like to say that I appreciate that you've asked the hard questions of people who are involved in cycling. Knowing what you know, I think your characterization of Armstrong as a cancer returning to the sport was fair, and I share the opinion of many that he hides his fraud behind the disease and any charity he may be doing.
Sincerely,
(redacted)
Dear Mr. Kimmage,
My name is (redacted). I'm a regular on the cyclingnews forum using the forum name of "buckwheat." I've been very critical of Jonathan Vaughters' reluctance to speak in clear unequivocal terms about doping and I feel that this undermines his desire to be seen as an advocate of clean sport. Because of his lack of complete transparency on the issue, doubts have crept in regarding his commitment to a drug free competition, and also to the purity of his own team.
Jonathan Vaughters sent me a personal message and encouraged me to contact you in order to possibly allay my doubts, I suppose? I got your contact information from a guy known as "(redacted)" from the cyclingnews site. I was waiting for JV to provide this info but (redacted) suggested I just use your email.
I was hesitant to contact you for a couple of reasons. First, I think it's JV's obligation to speak candidly on the issue. Secondly, I was kind of confused that he volunteered for you to vouch for him, because you are a journalist who makes his living doing research, conducting interviews, and writing books and articles. I didn't think it was his place to volunteer for you to give away your bread and butter for free.
I realize it's presumptuous of me to ask this of you. Is there any comment you can give about Jonathan Vaughters and his anti doping stance and efforts? This is just for use on cyclingnews forums and I will only paraphrase your comments if you are so generous to provide them.
Finally, I would just like to say that I appreciate that you've asked the hard questions of people who are involved in cycling. Knowing what you know, I think your characterization of Armstrong as a cancer returning to the sport was fair, and I share the opinion of many that he hides his fraud behind the disease and any charity he may be doing.
Sincerely,
(redacted)