sources?blackcat said:but Armstrong always had the hypodermics and saucepans.
he started the alchemy in triathlon.
cav woulda been similar. the way cycling is set up, favoured this athlete type. this psychology type.
interesting case will be how an ascent to the top, may change someone, and what definition of "change" is used. (this is psychology type).
is Wiggins gonna become a Mofo and patron in the Armstrong mould. Because he looks like he is a decent person. How will he leverage his new found power? I am of the postion, that the British track endurance program, never deserved their squeaky reputation through the 2000's. they did what the others did. which made it more hypocritical with the cofidis scandal when they were booted from the tour and vino ejected, and wiggins comments, because he woulda been on a maintenance program then. not a heavy duty program. do they give themselves a pass with this? because if they already think doping is no probs, just the health aspect is a concern http://www.newcyclingpathway.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/21-NOW-FINAL-.pdf
then why come out with the personal polemics when a rider like vino or ricco falls foul?
these folks cant even tell the truth to themselves
....