How fortunate that allergies didn't bother Contador at the 2008 and 2011 Giros. Miraculous, really.
Dr. Maserati said:That was my first thought also.
If JV/Garmin had hired Fromme ...
Moose McKnuckles said:How fortunate that allergies didn't bother Contador at the 2008 and 2011 Giros. Miraculous, really.
Poursuivant said:Kudos to JV for even coming on here.
Poursuivant said:Kudos to JV for even coming on here.
The Hitch said:Also Talansky was already a major talent in his youth considering he came 2nd to the guy who half the forum thinks will dominate climbing for the next decade, at the Tour de Lavenir.
And his ds is on here answering questions.
Moose McKnuckles said:It's called self-interest. It's in his own interest to get fans to believe in this "new cycling." It's his livelihood.
Soler had similar problems. With the difference that when he did not fall he was goooood.JimmyFingers said:JV did say that though: you take a chance on riders like that, roll the dice and see how they are on the road. Said he liked to take a chance on riders like that.
As for the first, anecdotaly much has been said about Froome's poor technical ability. Indeed Hog made a mockery of it in the Froome thread. You can't win races if you're falling off all the time. A simple coahing improvement would be to address that flaw.
The number one thing numbers don't show is in between the ears.JV1973 said:Numbers don't show durability, ability to improve, injury resistance, hormonal and immune system robustness.
Poursuivant said:Really surprised no one has mentioned Contador's "I am never very good this time of year" quote. All those allergies must just stop affecting the poor lad as soon as the calendar hits July.
ultimobici said:As one who suffers from hayfever every year I can tell you it does stop almost exactly the same time every year. May & June are dire, July onwards clear as a bell.
That said, "allergies" has been a stock cover story for aeons.
pmcg76 said:Except it is full of factual mistakes which JV admitted to when it was pointed out to him. Firstly Froome did not start racing bikes in Kenya at 17, he started racing on the road in South Africa at that age which is a completely different thing altogether and he was mountain-biking before that.
JVs opinion is based purely on him hearing that Froome had some big numbers but then he said big numbers are not a guarantee of GT success and other factors are just as relevant.
Then he talked about Froome's weaknesses on the bike, but seriously how could any guy even turn pro if they had such big issues on a bike, especially a guy who was racing from age 17 and had performed in Italian amateur races. What are these faults that when corrected will propel someone from average to superstar???
Lets just say his recovery this week has been amazing.The Hitch said:Also Talansky was already a major talent in his youth considering he came 2nd to the guy who half the forum thinks will dominate climbing for the next decade, at the Tour de Lavenir.
And his ds is on here answering questions.
The Hitch said:Well no he doesn't have to. The cycling media afterall has even more interest in telling everyone its clean, so JV could like everyone else ride that boat. The majority of fans want to believe everything is clean and believe anything the media tell them
This way isnt that effective but it is more honest.
Poursuivant said:Really surprised no one has mentioned Contador's "I am never very good this time of year" quote. All those allergies must just stop affecting the poor lad as soon as the calendar hits July.
GreasyMonkey said:I am not surprised by Contador's claim after the Dauphine Libre ITT that he was badly affected by allergies - I live in Madrid area (and am heavily impacted by pollens) and this year the pollens have been abysmal - people who have never had any trouble are being laid low with it.
frenchfry said:Well, I assume that he wasn't washing his hands enough for one thing. Marginal gains.
rata de sentina said:The number one thing numbers don't show is in between the ears.
thehog said:Frenchfry. What does the French press make of Froome and Sky train?
Is there much interest in Froome and his accent to the best rider in the world?
Are they questioning him?
JV1973 said:Ok, here's all the numbers:
42
frenchfry said:Interesting question - and this goes beyond just the treatment of Froome/Sky but also invites a look into the French presses treatment of the subject of doping in general.
I get the feeling that the French press doesn't really know what to think about Froome. This could be because he has no real history in cycling up to his explosion into the top levels, so not much to base a reaction on. Going on memory, I seem to recall references to best preparation, attention to detail and all that.
I watch France Televisions for television coverage of the races, and they avoid the subject of doping as much as possible. Thierry Adam, the lead commentator, is a Phil Ligget "light" and sang the praises of Armstrong until the very end. He knows about the doping, but holds the "cycling is clean/cleaner" line. Laurent Jalabert also tip toes around the subject and is totally unbelievable when he makes any comments on doping.
I will pay more attention to the consideration of specifically Froome/Sky and keep you posted.
thehog said:Frenchfry. What does the French press make of Froome and Sky train?
Is there much interest in Froome and his accent to the best rider in the world?
Are they questioning him?
