sniper said:It's just not pretty, all this Vaughters-UCI love.
http://velonews.competitor.com/2012...da-managed-program_263968#7XCxChuX9wTg3eIq.99
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-reveal-biological-passport-data-in-defence-of-cycling
Vaughters has been one of the early proponents of the so-called "biological passport" program...
...
"As a whole the race is clean," said Vaughters, who rode with Armstrong on the U.S. Postal Team in 1998 and 1999 before retiring in 2003. "I can't speak to every single athlete, but the probability of the Tour being won by a clean rider is much higher than it being won by a doped rider."
![]()
That is an odd statement.
If the odds of a win by a doped rider and a non-doped rider were equivalent, then the odds of a win could be related to a ratio between the number of doped and non-doped riders.
However, the existence of even a single doped rider spikes the results and games the system. Match fixing messes up the odds.
Hence the reason we want to get rid of doping.
Dave.