Bernhard said:Not everything written on cyclingnews is correct.
Original on kreuzigercase.com is different
I agree, it was just too funny not to post it
Bernhard said:Not everything written on cyclingnews is correct.
Original on kreuzigercase.com is different
rehy90 said:According to czech news, Kreuziger recently went through a lie detector test...and was successful...
Benotti69 said:Jeez if there was an IQ limit to get to be a pro, the peloton would be pretty small with idiots like Kreuziger around.
He rode Lombardia last year...Jancouver said:Roman Polygraph is scheduled to ride in Oman next week. WIll that really happen? Will UCI allow that or they just dont have any tools to stop him until the CAS verdict is out?
Netserk said:He rode Lombardia last year...
When Contador could win a Giro and ride the Tour while having his appeal yet to be decided (and also race San Luis the year after just a week before he was banned), I think Kreuziger will manage to race the first half of this year as well.Jancouver said:Yes, but that was before UCI filed the appeal papers with CAS if I'm not mistaking
Netserk said:When Contador could win a Giro and ride the Tour while having his appeal yet to be decided (and also race San Luis the year after just a week before he was banned), I think Kreuziger will manage to race the first half of this year as well.
Do you believe that polygraph tests are a way forward, that sport could use it to catch cheats as it does with the biological passport?
Who's laughing about MCE now!Do you believe that polygraph tests are a way forward, that sport could use it to catch cheats as it does with the biological passport?
Netserk said:When Contador could win a Giro and ride the Tour while having his appeal yet to be decided (and also race San Luis the year after just a week before he was banned), I think Kreuziger will manage to race the first half of this year as well.
Whose decision had it been to target test AC in the first place? ASo or UCI?DirtyWorks said:But, the UCI has blessed Contador. If it weren't for Seppelt, Contador would be never tested positive.
They are trying their best to bust Kreuziger down and out like Landis. I have no clue why they started. But, it's nothing like Contador.
The Hitch said:lol.
So riders could fail the real tests then just pass the polygraphs to show they were "clean"![]()
The Hitch said:IIRC Contador passed a polygraph test and his fans lapped it up. Imagine if the polygraph test was actually a real thing in the process his lawyers could use to hit WADA with and not just some BS he did on a reality tv show.
Hahahaha, oh god.VN: Have you ever doped or used banned substances?
RK: Certainly not. One only has to look at the responses that I gave during the lie detector test, the chance is only 0.0001 that you could be saying a lie.
hrotha said:Hahahaha, oh god.
LaFlorecita said:
The Hitch said:Didn't contador pass a polygraph in which he was asked if he doped? I thought I recalled you mentioning it as a joke in a contador about it being proof he didn't dope.
