flicker said:
Everything you say is true except for one thing. We all sin. We must forgive and live in peace. We must help one another. Lance has put himself on the cross. I will not judge Lance though. Not my job.
Not to flog a dead analogy but reading an interview with Oprah's alleged love interest, Steadman Graham the parallel characterizations are so close as to suggest LA and Oprah share the same Public Relations analyst:
According to Stedman Graham, the Chicago area needs to sit up and take stock of the benefits "The Oprah Winfrey Show” has brought to the city now while they still can. Winfrey's Chicago-based talk show ends in September, 2011.
During an interview with Fox News Chicago, Graham said he doesn’t think Chicagoans appreciate Winfrey.
“I don’t think they understand the value of who she is as a human being and what she’s done,” he told the anchors.
“Because a prophet has no honor in its home town.”
Mr. Oprah Winfrey – he doesn’t mind if you call him that, he said – added, “From an insider’s point of view, I don’t think she gets the just due based on who she really is and what’s she done for the Chicagoland area.”
First of all, he notes,
“she’s brought a lot of international attention to Chicago” with her talk show. And secondly, there’s the humanitarian work that she does, like her school in South Africa, he said.
Substitute Cycling for Chicago and Cancer for the school and it reads similarly to every justification for LA's defenders. Both celebrities (and let's call LA what he thinks he is-a celebrity) stress their triumph over humble beginnings, disfunctional/abusive family relationships, health problems and whatever. They never say the obvious; they must shroud their current incarnation with layers of non-disclosure contracts with their staff and they have few real friends. They also never state the super-obvious: they revel in the power of their wealth and influence.