You know there's a video, right?Here's a moment I would have loved to have seen!
Lars Daniels stops a horse chasing the peloton
In the first stage of the 2024 Arden Challenge, a horse ran onto the road and started chasing a big group of riders. Lars Daniels, who was at the back of the group, did not hesitate and grabbed the horse's reins, slowly stopping the animal. After the race, Daniels said he grew up around horses...www.procyclingstats.com
But you didn't click to watch it as you couldn't see it live, am I right?No I didn't.
But you didn't click to watch it as you couldn't see it live, am I right?
Nobody could see it live.
I have nothing against watching bits and pieces of a race afterwards, already knowing the results.
That's an unacceptable inconsistency.
It's the whole "Oh, I'll watch replays but just call it 'as-live', as if it in any way is that, hours later" thing I find silly.
And of course, in this case I never even had the option of watching it live; there was no live coverage.
[Silly picture]
Yes, that part is silly.There are people out there who straight up complains when cycling-news sites report on a race...
It is not silly at all to actively avoid spoilers and watch a race after it has taken place.
As long as you accept that it's 100% your responsibility.
For example, if you read this thread while there are multiple lesser known races going on, you might see results from a race you're not actively watching.
Nobody could see it live.