The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
You know there's a video, right?
But you didn't click to watch it as you couldn't see it live, am I right?No I didn't.
But you didn't click to watch it as you couldn't see it live, am I right?
Nobody could see it live.
I have nothing against watching bits and pieces of a race afterwards, already knowing the results.
That's an unacceptable inconsistency.
It's the whole "Oh, I'll watch replays but just call it 'as-live', as if it in any way is that, hours later" thing I find silly.
And of course, in this case I never even had the option of watching it live; there was no live coverage.
[Silly picture]
Yes, that part is silly.There are people out there who straight up complains when cycling-news sites report on a race...
It is not silly at all to actively avoid spoilers and watch a race after it has taken place.
As long as you accept that it's 100% your responsibility.
For example, if you read this thread while there are multiple lesser known races going on, you might see results from a race you're not actively watching.
Nobody could see it live.