The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
DominicDecoco said:Marco made the races richer in many ways. lance and Millar haven't.
gustienordic said:What about Ricco? Where does he rank on this.
SafeBet said:I'll repeat myself: Pantani was a national hero.
King Of The Wolds said:I was in Italy when Pantani died. The office was full of grown men in tears.
SafeBet said:I'm not sure you get the extent of Marco Pantani's phenomenon.
People who didn't give a fudge about cycling, even people who didn't know how to ride a bike, started watching the TdF for the sole presence of Pantani. The country was crazy about him.
I remember playing tennis at that time. In May we'd stop training and run to the TV if we heard he attacked on Mortirolo. It was collective madness.
Riccò is nowhere close to this. Cycling fans know about him. There might be someone remembering the blood bags in the fridge thing if they heard it in the media (but I'm pretty sure most of the standard dudes have already forgotten the name and labelled the whole thing as "usual dodgy rider").
And if we wanna speak about real cycling, the comparison doesn't even begin. Clinic related issues aside, Pantani won two GTs, podiumed three more, podiumed at Worlds. He has won more TdF stages than all italian riders combined in the last 7 years. What has Riccò achieved?
I'll repeat myself: Pantani was a national hero. And as Eshnar said: somewhat he still is, thanks to the martyr effect.
gustienordic said:What about Ricco? Where does he rank on this.
Bavarianrider said:If it wasn't for some bad crashes and the 99 Giro drama, surely Marco would have won a few more GT.
I am pretty sure he would have beaten Armstrong in 99m for example.
Bavarianrider said:Leaving all the clinic issues aside for a second.
Pantani was just one heck of a climber. He was the prototype of the climber. He's style of riding was just so unique. He was never feared to attack. He attacked from way before the finish line. He took the risk to blow up, no tactical rider at all. I guess Panatni was everything a climber lover can ask for. He simply was head and shoulders above any climber we saw in the last 30 years. If he saw a chance, he went for it. He didn't comlpain about the routes and flat parts or downhills after climbs. He simply took the route as it was and went for it.
Marco wasn't a pure climbe rlike Jiminez, though. Marco was no sluch in TT, too for example. If he really tried hard, he was a descent TTler considering his weight.
If it wasn't for some bad crashes and the 99 Giro drama, surely Marco would have won a few more GT.
I am pretty sure he would have beaten Armstrong in 99m for example.
Apart of that, Marco had this charisma. It 's hard to tell what it really was. But the guy was simply electrifying as hell.
It's so sad how it all at to end.
I remember the 2003 Giro as it was yesterday. Marco was back and for some moments there was real hope that he could make it to the top again.
I rember there was some talk after this Giro that Bianchi wanted to sign Marco as a helper for the 2003 Tour for Ullrich. This would have been the ****. And i am sure it would have won Ullrich the Tour, and it might have saved Marcos life.
But sadly w e know it all came differently. Marco wasn't invited to the Tour and many say that this was the final nail in the coffin of Marco Pantani.
Bavarianrider said:Leaving all the clinic issues aside for a second.
Marco was no sluch in TT, too for example. If he really tried hard, he was a descent TTler considering his weight.
If it wasn't for some bad crashes and the 99 Giro drama, surely Marco would have won a few more GT.
I am pretty sure he would have beaten Armstrong in 99m for example.
Apart of that, Marco had this charisma. It 's hard to tell what it really was. But the guy was simply electrifying as hell.
Zen Master said:Well probably you don't know but official name is the Stadio Giuseppe Meazza ( if you an Inter Milan fan ) or the San Siro ( the stadium is in the San Siro district ) if you an AC Milan fan because they don't want to use Inter's iconic player ( Giuseppe "Peppino" Meazza ) for the name of their stadium![]()
I'm sorry for you: you will never understand it.Clemson Cycling said:I never saw him race so I don't really understand why he is so likable.
Puerto said:You guys should watch some of the videos on youtube with him, and then ull see what made him a star![]()
Cookster15 said:Well said. But I wouldn't agree in you saying he was not a pure climber. At end of the day climbing is about maintained power to weight rather than power to wind resistance. To set those L'Alpe d'Huez times he was generating some pretty impressive power - even for 57kg. That power was still handy come TT time. I recall 420 watts being mentioned for Pantani, if so that's 7.4 watts / kg![]()