Yes, because he was working for Philipsen... if Philipsen wasn't there then he would've attacked himself or someone like Mohoric/Pidcock would have wonLast year he covered all attacks and was not at the finish line with the rest of them
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Yes, because he was working for Philipsen... if Philipsen wasn't there then he would've attacked himself or someone like Mohoric/Pidcock would have wonLast year he covered all attacks and was not at the finish line with the rest of them
I do fully agree with mixing up strategies rather than try the same thing every year. Even if it doesn't work you can just wait and try again in the finale.My thought process is you nuke the Capi just to thin out the peloton enough to decrease the likelihood of a well organized group forming after the Cipressa (don't care too much how exactly you approach that part), you let your two best doms set a maximally high pace on the first 3 km of the Cipressa and then you try and go. Would people still be able to follow? Perhaps yes, but I think he is quite a bit more likely to drop everyone there than on the Poggio.
Like, I'm not 100% convinced that's the best strategy or anything, but I think they'll have to try to mix it up because I just don't believe in him winning by attacking late on the Poggio.
Nobody is ready for Mattia Bais to win from the breakawaywith all the big guns showing good form this early season i expect a shootout of the superstars. But somehow i get this nagging feeling that everyone being in good form can open up the possibility for surprises even more, with the big guns possibly neutralizing each other. How about a surprise victory from Degenkolb? rolling back the clock a decade? Ok ok i know my Dege pick is too early and should save for Roubaix but everyone will be wise to it there.
No. My view is that Pogacar has to drop van der Poel else he won't win. I don't think driving hard on the Cipressa makes that any more likely, it just makes it less likely that a sprinter wins and more likely a late attack goes away instead. It potentially makes it easier for a late Pogacar attack, but I think he'll face the Sagan problem where everyone follows himSo you agree with me?
Good point about Nibali’s awesome win. As Sagan said in a post-race interviews (paraphrase): he’s the only one who had the balls to go for it.”Yes. But as was pointed out to me, Nibali’s amazing feat was only possible because they didn’t react until it was too late. Pog won’t have that luxury. But then he is Pog so who knows, his rivals, including MVDP will be nervous.
I think that’s a decent bet for this year. There are several riders in good form who might be able to stay close enough to Pog/MVDP over the Poggio and rejoin at the bottom. Then it’s possible to get a Stuyven/Cancellara type flyer with a 1-2 km to go IF Pog and MVDP look at each other for too long before chasing.All your fantastic puns aside, fwiw Van der Poel would count as a surname starting with a P in Dutch.
The big question is whether one of Van der Poel and Pogacar can go solo, if not then I expect another Mohoric/Stuyven calibre rider winning with a late attack. If the latter gets added to the startlist, then Ganna and Tarling could be the perfect one-two punch for those final kilometres.
AgreedI think that's contingent on him actually winning it eventually. I might have thought the same about Sagan but I can assure you that the anticlimactic thing was him not winning it and just get gradually worse and fizzling out in his later years.
I’m glad you pointed out the key factor when folks raise the idea of Pogacar going solo on the Cipressa. He might get a good gap but then there is the full peloton including sprinter’s teams flying down the shallow descent and flat prior to the start of Poggio. Yes, we see Pogacar do amazing long solo efforts but almost always from a smaller lead group that doesn’t have the firepower of a full peloton with strong rouleurs pulling. So as Gigs points out, for a Cipressa attack to be successful UAE would have to shred the peloton on the Capi to force a selection. Pretty unlikely though.I don't think Pogacar will ever win if he doesn't try something different. I stand by my claim that a Cipressa attack could work if UAE nukes the Capi and Pogacar attacks sufficiently early. I don't think he can survive against a big peloton between Cipressa and Poggio but I don't think there would be a big peloton in that scenario. And if he attacks on the Poggio he should do it early. The entire "let Wellens do a leadout" thing doesn't work because everyone knows exactly when the acceleration is coming and Van der Poel will be perfectly positioned to follow. Just attack as soon as the Poggio starts, do it from 20th place in the peloton if need be, but put yourself in a position where Van der Poel and the rest has to close two bikelengths. I don't think he will win that way, but I think he increases his chances compared to what he did the last few years.
Yes, that all makes sense. When Pogacar won the 2024 worlds he held off the pack for 51km like a carrot in front of a horse. But that was against smaller national teams and a different course with a climb every lap. There wasn't much flat for team roulers to pull him back - unlike MSR. I'd love to see UAE try though and maybe some panic set in.I’m glad you pointed out the key factor when folks raise the idea of Pogacar going solo on the Cipressa. He might get a good gap but then there is the full peloton including sprinter’s teams flying down the shallow descent and flat prior to the start of Poggio. Yes, we see Pogacar do amazing long solo efforts but almost always from a smaller lead group that doesn’t have the firepower of a full peloton with strong rouleurs pulling. So as Gigs points out, for a Cipressa attack to be successful UAE would have to shred the peloton on the Capi to force a selection. Pretty unlikely though.
I'd like that.Bling to finally won it
It's an hour now? Before it was 45 minutes! And to be perfectly honest even that seems a bit much. Realistically the action starts at the Poggio.Let's be honest, nobody has a clue, including the riders, what's gonna happen. Without doubt the best hour of the season.
I think the drama of the buildup heading into the Cipressa is part of what makes the finale (Poggio) so exciting. Most of us, consciously or not, try to "read" what we see happening in the race--e.g., who is positioned where, who looks a little ragged, who has to spend extra energy after a puncture, etc. Not that these necessarily (or ever?) pan out as good predictors but is a natural way for fans to engage with the race. I'm sure there are exceptions--like folks who have bet on the race and just want to watch if their rider (or riders) compete for the win on the Poggio climb & descent.It's an hour now? Before it was 45 minutes! And to be perfectly honest even that seems a bit much. Realistically the action starts at the Poggio.
The left-hand hairpin is quite tight, but at that point it is usually all stretched out.Are there any parts of the Poggio on the hairpins that are narrow enough that setting a go slow and blocking with 4 riders when your leader attacks can cause the kind of carnage often seen on the Koppenberg when a rider crashes or has a mechanical issue?
Let's be honest, nobody has a clue, including the riders, what's gonna happen. Without doubt the best 15 minutes of the season.
Thanks for posting that, just watched that replay. A couple of things stood out. I didn't remember the chase group did so much d*cking around in the last 2 km--they could easily have caught Stuyven--but none were willing to commit (understandable to not want to drag someone else to the win but disappointing to watch nonetheless).2021 - stujven mugs them all after an attack at the bottom of poggio descent, with soren krajg's baffling tactics playing a staring role
View: https://youtu.be/nwImB_9qfK0?si=g9X5wP37VSZkXpao
I would say, Pidcock is much better this year.Thanks for posting that, just watched that replay. A couple of things stood out. I didn't remember the chase group did so much d*cking around in the last 2 km--they could easily have caught Stuyven--but none were willing to commit (understandable to not want to drag someone else to the win but disappointing to watch nonetheless).
Also, for those suggesting Pidcock can win via attack on the descent, in that edition he went hard from the front during the bottom half of the descent around the sharpest corners. But couldn't create a gap to Van Aert on his wheel. Even less likely he could get away from MVDP that way.