As it should be.John de Savage said:One Championship bans weight cutting by dehydration
http://onefc.com/news/611-one-championship-revolutionizes-mma-with-new-weigh-in.html
As it should be.John de Savage said:One Championship bans weight cutting by dehydration
http://onefc.com/news/611-one-championship-revolutionizes-mma-with-new-weigh-in.html
Is that why they released this?StyrbjornSterki said:There's no news yet of a McGregor-Aldo rematch, and the rumour among the MMA forums is that Dana was looking for a way to ditch Aldo because his lack of flamboyancy limited his gate appeal.
I don't know their rationale but this isn't the first time. The same happened when Stephan Struve fainted in the locker room before a bout scheduled with Matt Mitrione (presumed panic attack). Struve was sobbing inconsolably.Jacques de Molay said:Is that why they released this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pM-P-ubt5Wg
Pretty disrespectful, and totally uncalled for. UFC showing their true colors.
What kind of a message does that send to every other athlete who signed a contract with Dana White?
Dominate for ten years. Too bad. They'll hang you out to dry as it suits them.
As far as losing a point, I think that a fighter loses a point on the third infraction, and Browne only had two so no point deduction. It could be argued that they lose a point on the second infraction. Browne seemed sincerely sorry in his post fight interview.StyrbjornSterki said:It's been brewing for some time but I think this weekend's UFC Fight Night 86 finally will motivate Dana White to get off the pot and do something about eye pokes. Matt Mitrione always steps up and never turns him down when Dana calls, and he deserves better than this.
Potentially disturbing image here.
That's what the aftermath of a fractured orbital floor looks like. Matt got that because Travis Browne went full-goose Three Stooges on him and "accidentally" poked him in the eye, not once but twice.
![]()
The incredible bit is that Browne didn't get so much as a single point deducted. Mitrione was looked at by the ring doctor and allowed to continue, so it is improbable that anyone could have known the extent of the damage at that moment, but that is exactly the point. Apart from the potential risk of permanent loss of sight, where's the fairness in expecting a fighter to continue after receiving this sort of injury, the true extent of which cannot be determined until after the fight?
Matt lost the contest, but in no small part due to the fact that Browne (legally) targeted the eye he already (illegally) had inflicted a devastating injury on.
The UFC has elevated MMA to the highest plateau it ever has achieved, probably as high as it ever could be without engaging in fights to the death. And it continues to evolve. In the short time I have been a fan, I can trace the progression of what the most effective techniques are. And Dana and the Fertittas are growing fat from it (their casino company is about to go public, BTW). They can't expect athletes to invest in elevating their game in order to compete at this level if they don't offer them sensible protections to their health and livelihood.
The current rules allow that if a fighter can't continue as result of an eye poke early enough in the fight, it goes down as a NC. I know the UFC have had an "eye-friendly" glove in development for at least three years. If it still isn't ready for prime time, they need to introduce penalties so draconian as to cause the fighters to self-police. Take it out of the referee's discretion. The first eye-poke should result in a mandatory point(s) penalty and the second a mandatory DQ. If not a DQ on the first occurrence. And if the ring doctor stops the fight on account of an eye injury, and video replay shows it was a finger poke did the damage, that too should be a mandatory DQ.
It's important to note, too, that it's the same fighters who keep having "accidental" eye-pokes over and over. Jon 'Bones' Jones, Josh Koscheck, and Michael 'The Count' Bisping come to mind. Which gives rise to suspicions that they're using it as just another part of their offensive arsenal. Regardless of intent, they clearly are more effective as fighters as a consequence of the illegal tactic.
I also know Matt Mitrione is one of those fighters Dana lauds for his unflinching willingness to do whatever is required to support the company. How Dana responds to this incident I think will speak volumes about whether he still has a heart or whether it was excised and replaced with a P&L ledger.
The problem with that rule is it effectively legalises the first two pokes, a 'loophole' that the Jon Joneses and Michael Bispings of the world gladly will avail themselves of.jmdirt said:As far as losing a point, I think that a fighter loses a point on the third infraction, and Browne only had two so no point deduction. It could be argued that they lose a point on the second infraction. Browne seemed sincerely sorry in his post fight interview.
True, it does make two eye pokes legal. MMA fighters need to be able to use their hands to grapple, but that means that they can use their fingers for eye pokes as well. I've seen a few of the "safety" gloves and the compromise is phalanges mobility issues.StyrbjornSterki said:The problem with that rule is it effectively legalises the first two pokes, a 'loophole' that the Jon Joneses and Michael Bispings of the world gladly will avail themselves of.jmdirt said:As far as losing a point, I think that a fighter loses a point on the third infraction, and Browne only had two so no point deduction. It could be argued that they lose a point on the second infraction. Browne seemed sincerely sorry in his post fight interview.
Now Mitrione is saying the ref and/or ring doctor should have exercised the common sense he failed to. Better he should have left that one alone. Makes him sound whingy, all wrong for his idiom.
...I wanted to make something clear to the UFC: for everything that I've done, everything I've accepted, and mostly how the fight ended, I will not accept any other fight other than a title shot....
It's one of those things, we made the fight the first time and he got hurt and had to pull out. Then we made it again and it ended in 13 seconds. It's tough to make that fight again right away.
He is an amazing talent who will win his share of fights, but he got schooled.StyrbjornSterki said:Northcutt got schooled.
There seems to be a reason for that. I was wondering why he looked somewhat flat-footed and wasn't employing more of his kicking prowess early on. I suppose this explains it.jmdirt said:He is an amazing talent who will win his share of fights, but he got schooled.StyrbjornSterki said:Northcutt got schooled.
I have been a supporter of "walking weight" wrestling, boxing, and MMA for 20 years and would love to see it as part of governing body rules so that it doesn't matter what state or country they fight in. The NCAA has tightened it a bit, but they could do more.StyrbjornSterki said:California State Athletic Commission has banned "extreme weight-cutting." Plans to monitor hydration through specific gravity of urine. Under the circumstances, I wonder if the greater effect won't be more to drive professional MMA competitions to other states (and I'm thinking Nevada in particular) rather than to make the sport safer. I'm thinking to be successful, something like this either needs to be implemented nation-wide, or from the top down. Maybe I'm being naïve but I don't think it will have the desired impact until they're doing it in Vegas.