Funny, I used to hate the Crue... back in the early 80s when I was barely a teen it was a thing between the New Romantics and the Rockers (I was the former), but now I actually appreciate the Crue. Their music wasn't really all that bad after all.jmdirt said:The Dirt
This was a good one for me. I was a teen in the 80s who loved rock so Motley was/is important. I read the book in the early '00 so this interpretation was different than the one I created in my head, but good non the less.![]()
Tricycle Rider said:Funny, I used to hate the Crue... back in the early 80s when I was barely a teen it was a thing between the New Romantics and the Rockers (I was the former), but now I actually appreciate the Crue. Their music wasn't really all that bad after all.jmdirt said:The Dirt
This was a good one for me. I was a teen in the 80s who loved rock so Motley was/is important. I read the book in the early '00 so this interpretation was different than the one I created in my head, but good non the less.![]()
Would like to see that The Dirt doc, but am not prepared to pay Netflix for it unless they give me some kind of a free dealy. (Cause no matter how old-ish I get I'm still frugal.)
Loved 'em both! Liked Sammy too, but I'm with you, I didn't like Van Hagar.movingtarget said:Tricycle Rider said:Funny, I used to hate the Crue... back in the early 80s when I was barely a teen it was a thing between the New Romantics and the Rockers (I was the former), but now I actually appreciate the Crue. Their music wasn't really all that bad after all.jmdirt said:The Dirt
This was a good one for me. I was a teen in the 80s who loved rock so Motley was/is important. I read the book in the early '00 so this interpretation was different than the one I created in my head, but good non the less.![]()
Would like to see that The Dirt doc, but am not prepared to pay Netflix for it unless they give me some kind of a free dealy. (Cause no matter how old-ish I get I'm still frugal.)
Never really got into them. Preferred Van Halen at least until Roth left the band.
jmdirt said:BlacKKKlansman
Not that great IMO and they could have taken 30 minutes out of it (but I feel that way about any movie that gets over 2 hrs!)
Good enough movie. Hits the target certainly and I haven't regretted watching it. And there's always the book for those more interested in the events. Thanks for the tip.movingtarget said:jmdirt said:BlacKKKlansman
Not that great IMO and they could have taken 30 minutes out of it (but I feel that way about any movie that gets over 2 hrs!)
Ken Russell the English director, once said that the ideal length for a movie was 90 minutes. Most of the time I think he was right. 2.5 to 3.0 hour action, sci/fi, and Marvel movies just don't work most of the time because the story is not interesting enough to hold your attention. The best horror movies are the shorter ones.
Movies like The Godfather or Once upon a time in America wouldn't work so well with only 90 minutes. You need to see almost every scene in order to understand the whole film. For horror and action films I agree, 90 minutes can be enough.movingtarget said:jmdirt said:BlacKKKlansman
Not that great IMO and they could have taken 30 minutes out of it (but I feel that way about any movie that gets over 2 hrs!)
Ken Russell the English director, once said that the ideal length for a movie was 90 minutes. Most of the time I think he was right. 2.5 to 3.0 hour action, sci/fi, and Marvel movies just don't work most of the time because the story is not interesting enough to hold your attention. The best horror movies are the shorter ones.
Laplaz said:Movies like The Godfather or Once upon a time in America wouldn't work so well with only 90 minutes. You need to see almost every scene in order to understand the whole film. For horror and action films I agree, 90 minutes can be enough.movingtarget said:jmdirt said:BlacKKKlansman
Not that great IMO and they could have taken 30 minutes out of it (but I feel that way about any movie that gets over 2 hrs!)
Ken Russell the English director, once said that the ideal length for a movie was 90 minutes. Most of the time I think he was right. 2.5 to 3.0 hour action, sci/fi, and Marvel movies just don't work most of the time because the story is not interesting enough to hold your attention. The best horror movies are the shorter ones.
Somebody already watched Once upon a time in Hollywood? How is it?
I'd actually really like to watch this, but am having trouble navigating the subtitles. How do you do it?
I'd actually really like to watch this, but am having trouble navigating the subtitles. How do you do it?
On my end I watched a couple of thrillers yesterday, first one was All-American Murder (1991) with Christopher Walken - I guess he needed the paycheck.
The movie was direct to DVD, it was laughably stupid. But if you want to see some frat and sorority people get killed (which I'm always a fan of), and want to see bad 90s hair and fashion, this is the flick for you.
The other one was Insomnia (2002) with Al Pacino and Robin Williams, it was okay. Al wasn't being his usual bombastic self, and it was weird seeing Robin Williams play the bad guy.
The scenery was nice, though, the story was supposed to be taking place in Alaska. But it was actually filmed in lovely British Columbia, have always loved B.C.
Posting the subtitles link is just me trying to be helpful.I'd actually really like to watch this, but am having trouble navigating the subtitles. How do you do it?
Yes indeed, a lot of the original series was filmed in British Columbia. Don't know if it's still true today, but back then it was cheaper to film in Canada, so that's why they did it. (I'm glad they did, like I mentioned upthread B.C. is beautiful from what I have seen with my own two eyes.)Agree that Insomnia was okay at best.
Walken became a bit typecast unfortunately but some of his performances were seriously loopy. I thought he was great in The Dead Zone, The King of New York, True Romance,Communion, the Deer Hunter and Blast From The Past.
The X Files series was mostly filmed in Canada from what I remember.
I'm glad you did post the subtitles link, I ended up downloading the srt. file and converting it into a text file. And then, because that is where my computer skills end, I just read the text file like a movie script before I played the video. Some of the English translations were funny because they were so off, but I generally got the gist of the film once actually watching it.Posting the subtitles link is just me trying to be helpful.
To apply the subtitles you need to rip the movie first, and then, if there's disharmony between the picture and text, use some synchronizing software.