LaFlorecita said:I've come to the point where I'd prefer McQuaid over Cookson. A British UCI president while a british team is dominating doesn't seem right to me. Ideally someone else would win but oh well.
hrotha said:There's reason to fear Cookson might be a corrupt quack. But we know McQuaid is exactly that. The choice is clear to me.
hrotha said:There's reason to fear Cookson might be a corrupt quack. But we know McQuaid is exactly that. The choice is clear to me.
bobbins said:Does anyone else think that there was too much going on at the top for Cookson not to have known?
He seems to be blind to various indiscretions in the UK and now within the UCI.
I'm seriously doubting that he's the right person to take the sport forward.
JimmyFingers said:I believe so: they have to be ratified, then everything is backdated so Pat can stand with the Moroccan and Thai endorsements.
del1962 said:So just over one third of delegates just have to disagree and PMQ can't stand
bianchigirl said:A leaked dossier that tells us nothing we didn't know with makarov & plants fingers all over it.
A man who said in January he wouldn't dream of standing against mcquaid who was doing a good job in his opinion.
Cookson says he'll be a 'listening president' - listening to makarov and plant
Like landis said, it's time to burn it all down
Moose McKnuckles said:A few years from now, we'll be having the same discussions about Cookson that we're having now about McQuaid.
Most of you already know this too.
Dr. Maserati said:Explain how or why?
I don't get this sort of post. It is completely void of any point or argument.
Cookson is President of BC. Sky is a British team. That is the argument.Dr. Maserati said:I don't get this sort of post. It is completely void of any point or argument.
King Boonen said:Last I heard the nominations were within the time limit and from federations he is a member of, so the vote doesn't matter for the election.
May be wrong though, will check this evening.
Moose McKnuckles said:Just because you don't get the point, doesn't mean there isn't one that maybe others who don't need the obvious explained to them can get.
Cookson appears just as dirty as McQuaid. In a few years we'll revisit the same criticisms of McQuaid except we'll be applying them to Cookson.
I really had to explain this to you? Really? I assume you're in some time zone where it's drinking time, because you've obviously had a few.
Don't be late Pedro said:Cookson is President of BC. Sky is a British team. That is the argument.
(I know you know this but I thought I would just reiterate it.)
If he was a multiple winner of the Sea Otter Classic then Moose would probably vote for him since he always would have shown talent.
Sea Otter Classic seems to attract big names from what I can see. Don't knock it. And I like Otters so its a win win.Moose McKnuckles said:If by Sea Otter Classic you mean virtually every race on the US calendar, then maybe.
It's no "Atomic Jock Race", I'll grant you that.
Dr. Maserati said:Nice, the personal stuff.
Its early here (which in itself is no reason not to be drinking) but, sadly no.
Lets start from the beginning, appears or is?
If Cookson farms out anti-doping as he has said he will, how does he get up to anything close to McQuaid/HV?
Don't be late Pedro said:Sea Otter Classic seems to attract big names from what I can see. Don't knock it. And I like Otters so its a win win.
Well, you did to some extent. You always said he had talent.Moose McKnuckles said:Who knew that Sea Otter and the Atomic Jock Race were such accurate predictors of future greatness?