D-Queued said:Not sure what relevance it may have, but Vrijman is one weird looking dude.
Yup, I heard from many people that he came across horribly in the movie.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
D-Queued said:Not sure what relevance it may have, but Vrijman is one weird looking dude.
Race Radio said:Yup, I heard from many people that he came across horribly in the movie.
D-Queued said:Gibney came right out and stated that Lance had paid ($100,000) for the Vrijman report, and directly implicated Verbruggen and McQuaid as well.
Not sure what relevance it may have, but Vrijman is one weird looking dude.
Dave.
caryopsis said:He looks almost normal there, his cheeks were at least twice that size in the film.
-- SPOILER --
I was also pleasantly surprised at the prevalent role Ferrari had in the film. Gibney was able to interview him, even to the point of showing him watching the televised 2009 Ventoux climb with a stopwatch in hand to time Lance's efforts. Also surprised to see Lance admit on camera some of the things Ferrari did for them and advised them on - maybe he's said as much publicly before, but I hadn't recalled it. Then, switch to Ferrari watching the races or speaking about anything but blood or doping...I wonder what the good doctor thinks of the film (and Lance) now that it's complete?
caryopsis said:He looks almost normal there, his cheeks were at least twice that size in the film.
...
Berzin said:Someone refresh my memory-what is this "Vrijman Report" and why is it important in this narrative?
darwin553 said:Does anyone know whether Lance is getting a piece of the film's takings?
gooner said:Probably no surprise in the end, the judge sides with Armstrong in the book lawsuit.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/judges-sides-armstrong-book-lawsuit
gooner said:Probably no surprise in the end, the judge sides with Armstrong in the book lawsuit.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/judges-sides-armstrong-book-lawsuit
Race Radio said:Lying it totally cool guys
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...ng-books-judge-rules-first-amendment/2795771/
pretty much expected. Silly waste of time
86TDFWinner said:LOL, he dodged a small bullet there. If someone gave me a copy of his book(-and they've tried to), I still wouldn't take them.
BroDeal said:I always assumed Vrijman simply wrote the report to support the conclusions he had been told to make by McQuaid/Verbruggen. Armstrong's lawyers actually writing and revising the report is certainly a cheeky bit of corruption I was not expecting.
Race Radio said:Lying it totally cool guys
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...ng-books-judge-rules-first-amendment/2795771/
pretty much expected. Silly waste of time
Deagol said:Doesn't that mean LA's lawyers knowingly lied to Judge Sam Sparks during the suit to dismiss USADA last year?
Benotti69 said:Would be great to see Sparks tear a new a**hole out of Fabiani for lying to him.
puffin said:Dont know if this has been posted elsewhere but:
New film 'The Armstrong Lie' looks interesting..
'He had been commissioned to make what most people expected would be an uplifting documentary about Armstrong's second comeback, for the 2009 Tour de France. The famous cyclist, thinking the movie would be a puff piece, gave Gibney unprecedented access. Gibney filmed Armstrong lounging in hotel rooms, joking with his inner circle, getting upset with surprise drugs tests at his home as his daughters look on. Armstrong also allowed Gibney to interview Michele Ferrari, his notorious "doping doctor", who admits with a grin to continuing to give Armstrong "advice" well past the date Armstrong had supposedly cut off ties.'
See:
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/sep/11/lance-armstrong-alex-gibney-armstrong-lie-review-toronto
Deagol said:Doesn't that mean LA's lawyers knowingly lied to Judge Sam Sparks during the suit to dismiss USADA last year?
D-Queued said:" ...if these bodies wish to damage the image of their sport through bitter infighting, they will have to do so without the involvement of the United States courts."
Dave.
DirtyWorks said:Can I get an Amen? Amen!
Meanwhile Maloney at Road Bike Distraction is desperately trying recreate the myth, entirely intact with a strange spin on the Wonderboy creep-umentary and taking cheap shots at veloclinic. Carmichael still has a column there too. Ewww.
No, I won't link to it.
Race Radio said:Yeah, no need to link to that garbage......it smells a lot like that disturbed guy who used to post here a bunch. Funny how they all have the same absurd talking points, it is almost like it is coordinated or something. Can't image rational people come up with that nonsense independently